anyway back to topic so we don’t get this thread shut down-
Do we have any idea on what the “new” US fighter could be?
Oh I meant lofting not notching my bad
A dev blog forum post? shut down?
1 Like
Well by design it’s basically an air to air ballistic missile, so it kind of has to loft super high anyways.
how about ‘muted for not following topic’ or something among those lines then?
let me cook
Will we maybe see a new devblog tomorrow?
Its the weekend tomorrow, so that would be a nope :)
2 Likes
I guess maybe Monday perhaps? :)
Everything is subject to change, though. We’ll see :P
1 Like
will the F/A-18F eventually be added to the US tree or no? missed in in case you answered that earlier.
1 Like
no bruh
Imagine wanting to grind the same jet twice only for an additional seat and nothing else
1 Like
And heavier, please No
No plans for that currently as a researchable vehicle. As the F/A-18E already does everything the F does, whilst the F model was the only variant used by the RAAF (They do not operate the E). So it provides something flavourable to them and a Superhornet for the British tree.
7 Likes
Please keep it this way🙏:) we want f15ex instead lol
1 Like
We want to be happy*
1 Like
the aim54 was also made to loft as well
And it does. Problem is most F-14A/B players never go higher than 25K ft to launch. Of course, the F-14A IRIAF doesn’t need to because Fakour-90 has tons of energy shortly after release and goes pretty far (iirc, roughly 70 km? Insane) pretty quickly.
Yeah some don’t but I try to go high as possible also most people go flying close to the ground so most of the time you don’t really need to fly that high while most arh planes also try to go 20,000ft+ witch I try to target but like I said before It dosent really loft (in game) also why I said I never seen it loft to 50,000 ft when lunched at 25,000ft for a target 46 miles away. witch why I was saying the r37 probably gonna be like a f-90 on steroids