R-73 (40G) vs. AIM-9X (50G) – Where's the 60G fix for R-73?

it is already

Send link

https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/QTtoB2eV5KwL

Well, as I said, two years of waiting will come to nothing because nobody knows if the Russians are right.

the brochure is right, it is legit 100% primary source
i backed it with article also saying 60G

1 Like

“Russia suffers” </3

2 Likes

If you’re here to complain about russia there are plenty of cope threads elsewhere

6 Likes

??? Woah woah hold your fire dude. Putting words into my mouth!! Who said I’m coping!!! Also threads?? Like instragram?

R73 literally the best air-launched IR missile
It is confirmed both by my gameplay feeling and missile stats spreadsheet

3 Likes

Also half the size

Dah comrade but they need to buff r73 to 69g

British SRAAM:

Translation: Confirmed by me. Source: It feels like it

3 Likes

i know how hard it can be not to be able to read, so i point you directly
next time try better

1 Like

Not the point. The R-73 is gimped on it’s max G pull abilities in contrary to IRL abilities and in range because it oscillates like crazy making it lose lots of energy

still it flies further and faster than aim9m

Still underperforming. I’m all for other missiles getting buffed too i just don’t have the info to help the others.

Huh? Since when did R-73 outrange AIM-9M? You can comfortably use that missile up to 6km while the R-73 is just straight up a lucky shot beyond 3km

1 Like

Oh you mean experimental missile that barely works, doesnt have any range nor ırccm? Not to mention it has no business in top tier.

Lol.

5 Likes

What in the missile spreadsheet tells you it’s the best IR missile? The PL-8B and Magic II have the same exact seeker, both of which have a better range and aerodynamic performance than the R-73. The only advantage it has is TVC, you trade its kinematic performance for that. You can easily argue that stand-off range and acceleration is more important than TVC.