You can hold a lot of ammunition outside of thr vehicle, does it mean they they should have them? Why should a tank designed to carry two be able to usethe same as one that was designed to carry 10?
Yes they can, the puma is not the first ifv to have just 4 missiles.
They already have 2 more than they should.
I mentioned every ifv that used it but i forgot about the swedish one and said that All of them should get more of these not only the puma but I make it my focuses because of it being at 11.0 and still in real life if it doesn’t Carry infantry in the back seat it could transport ammunition off any type that fit in there and of course an 1 meter 9kg small tubes could be carried in higher number than 2
Show me any evidence that a puma crew ever did this, and again any vehicle could do this, why should they get more than many of the vehicles that actually have more missiles? i mean why any vehicle carry the shoulder spikes mounted one and fire them from the commanders cupola, again just because they can doesnt mean that they should.
A bmp 2 can only carry 4 missiles does that mean that it should have 12 just because the Bradley have 12, obviously not, the same applies here.
1 Like
Cry little us main 😂
1 Like
🤣🤣🤣 good one buddy, i dont even play the us…
I don’t see any holders for them but in the game Thay are modeled in the floor
So the developers go’s against your argument and there is a place for more of these
Are you going to argue for giving the leopard a few extra rounds because the driver can probably drive with one in his lap and you could probably have a few just lying at the bottom of the turret basket?
This is beyond stupid.
…
And how do you know that’s an S1?
Nah, im feeling like giving them a couple of stingers.
1 Like
Every tank should be given a javelin that the driver just opens his hatch and fires
1 Like
And 10 of them bolted on the side skirts
Well duh the crew could do whatever mad-max creation they want with their vehicles, so therefore War Thunder should just be replaced with Crossout!
1 Like
they are designed to carry more. They are designed to be flexible. What are you even trying to argue here?
no it can’t. God you are annoying
amazing. You immature kiddo missed the point entirely
My guy hes arguing that vehicles should carry extra ammo just because you theoretically could squeeze one more shell into somewhere which isn’t a designated ammo rack, retarded logic is retarded logic.
You know, people do tend to project their own insecurities when lashing out. Prove they carry more than 4 missiles if you want more, it aint that hard “kiddo”. Stop being immature with all the ad hominems and actually adress the points then.
Also:
Tell me you’ve never served on an IFV without telling me you’ve never served on an IFV. Though what should I expect, some 15 year old would never have been in contact with a single vehicle outside his parents car and maybe something in a museum.
Any proof? Is there a rack that will safely hold them in place?
Storing expensive and explosive ordinance by laying them freely around on the floor doesnt sounds like a design choice.