8.7
yeaaaaah I feel like there should be a discount for the reskin premiums if you have the TT variant already
Or being able to buy the skin for the TT variant.
Like with a premium you’re paying to research the tree it’s in quicker (for better or for worse), so they end up a bit pricey if you already have the tree unlocked.
Or they could just sell the different decorations by themselves
I mean I know people gave them excuses by saying “we don’t want the premiums locked behind a paywall” now prems are just copy paste.
for me? it’s pointless and i’m a bit buggered off at it, I love pattons and I hate that one can even be considered for sixty euros it’s a ridiculous price for a BR 8,.7
Given that they are specifically pushing this as the desert storm variant it would be really dumb not to give it its historic rounds. However, I wouldn’t put it past them.
If it had the M900 I wouldn’t even need to think about purchasing it. It would be automatic.
It’s not a Patton, pattons ended with the m48
The RISE P we have in game is already a Desert Storm variant. Why do we need a premium version that’s just a cosmetic difference?
What even? it’s an M60 patton dude even if it’s not the “official” name by the US army, you can bet all the tankies called it a patton. Can tell you that the ones I know do.
It’s not stated as to have them, surely if it was getting m883 or M900 they would mention it as a draw in.
Same man lol
Exactly. even the one in game is missing it’s historical loadouts which sucks.
Good point.
Patton only stuck because the media incorrectly referred to it as such, however it is not a member of the Patton series
Look if you’re not gonna call it a patton for ease of use and be pedantic about it.
Use its full real name.
Tank, Combat, Full Tracked: 105-mm Gun, M60
Or as the eld tankies call it the product improved M48
Or , or you could just let us call it the colloquial coined term , patton.
I just call it the m60 as that’s its designation
good for you others aren’t naming it incorrectly either, it is coined by crewmen, tankies and historians the like, Patton. It’s a descendent of the M48 hence the name being reused, even if not officiated by the US military.
So don’t start telling others what to call it. Unless you are prepared to use the full designated name by the US military.
As I said, or you could just leave folks alone and keep the topic talking about what this thing may , or may not, actually bring to the table. Seeing as it’s a 60 euro premium at rank 6 and BR 8.7
Did I tell you not to call it that, no. I simply stated that it’s not a Patton, don’t take what people say and twist it. Bit hard to argue against a historical fact.
it is commonly and colloquially refered to as a patton, when a term is coined colloquially it tends to become common, wether or not you want to call it that or not is irrelevant.
I am not arguing a historical fact, you clearly cannot read properly. It’s historically been coined for almost 70 years as a Patton, not officially named that by the US military but that is what it has been coined as.
If you do not understand what “coined” means I recommend you look it up.
What was the point in your commont other than to try and cause some kind of debate / argument anyway?
Technically, it’s not designated only the M60 either, so you are wrong too. It’s Tank, Combat, Full Tracked: 105-mm Gun, M60. Which is the whole designation.
So I ask you again, before I ping a mod for you to be a troll what was the point in your original comment to detract for the actual discussion at hand?
To inform you that Patton is not its official designation. That was the purpose. END OF DISCUSSION since your the one who decided to make this an argument instead of just simply acknowledging that you know that it’s not it’s official name.
I am well aware of that, Nor is M60 the official designation either.
If you’ve nothing genuinely worth contributing to this then just stop.
You’ve completely ignored what I’ve said to you as well just to try and cause some form of engagement. which is called trolling lol. Any futher without something actually relevant to the original point I made of the tank, then I’ll bring it up to the mods as just that.
You edited that in nicely mate after you pinged this whole crap off. if you want to use it’s official name form the US army, then call it the Tank, Combat, Full Tracked : 105MM gun, M60. Don’t come in there and try act like others don’t know designations and you do when you don’t use it properly.
You could of said, BTW you know the m60 technically isn’t a patton, and it wouldn’t of went this way. No you said.
“It’s not a Patton, pattons ended with the m48” which had absolutely zero to do with the actual things we where discussing and hence why it’s caused this.
Learn to engage properly and maybe it won’t end in folks getting aggrevated.
They did that for the dragoon. Maybe it is a sign of things to come.