The XM-1 was unavailable for many players for quite some time.
M60s already in-game are 8.3-9.0. Which is why Id guess this would be around 9.3. M900 sounds like it would make it a Rank VII not a Rank VI and be more like 10.0/10.3. thats assuming its better and therefore a higher BR than the RISE at 8.7.
Either way, probably not getting M900
Why so many premiums this update
Wrong camo. We have no sources indicating the Predator ever used a woodland camo,only the desert camo in the Gulf War.
Moreover,no US vehicles used the woodland camo: the only ones were the Standard Desert and the CARC Green. Only US personnel used the woodland uniform, but that was due to the lack of readily available Desert uniform for all when the war begun.
Also,when will you fix M735 now that you’re adding a vehicle that uses the M735 as its best round?
2 Likes
M735 as top shell,8.7 BR, only good alongside T58 now as the rest of US prems stayed at 8.0
1 Like
We’ve got to have…money!
From what I remember the US Army did not deploy any M60A1s in desert storm, they only deployed M60A3 TTS and the M60A1 Rise P was exclusively used by the Marine Corps in the conflict.
2 Likes
It have thermals,normal RISE doesnt,so my guess is 9.0 like TTS
Why would this be 2 steps higher than the TT M60 RISE? If it got M900 then 9.3 or 9.7 would be fine since it’s still higher than the A3 TTS with thermals and LRF
M900??
2 Likes
Damn this is the first legit source of the USMC using M900 rounds in the Patton,this means the M900A1 was real and was “hastily” created for the Pattons in the Gulf War.
Where did you find this?
Neat, but I’d personally prefer if you put a searchlight on it. I think the M60s would look so much better with their searchlights as cosmetic options
1991 tank with 1981 shells doesn’t make sense to me
The searchlights were not needed with the TTS and not compatible with the ERA kit. The mantle block of tiles used the searchlight mounts. You would need to backdate the tank to the early 80s to see the last of the searchlight Pattons.
Rounds have always been a balancing decision, Took 2? years of arguing to get L26 on the CR1DS and it naturally did move up. The question is does this M60 benefit more from a better round or a lower BR?
I can think of a number of aircraft for example that should have better AAMs than they have currently but Id actually prefer if they got AAM nerfs so they could move down in BR
This is an excerpt from the book M60 vs T-62: Cold War Combatants 1956–92
1 Like
premium update … pay your update …
1 Like
Pretty cool tank name decal, will it be released individually?
M60A1 RISE “Predator”, 1991
Not sure about the additional track on the turret cheeks and glacis, that looks like a lot of weight to add onto the ERA mounting. I’d appreciate if anyone has a picture to prove me wrong!
2 Likes