Didn’t get any fix. No Mach 5 , No shoot down all aspect , No overhaul.
No 7P , No 120. This gonna be very bad now.
“The previous variant was removed from the options, the new version will be functionally identical in performance to the existing C model, just with different cooling methods.”
Because in game the missile gets cooled…
And like everything else than the engine and the chasis was the same missile…
The clown energy is real deal with them.
1 Like
As it should. They have very similar performance and without ECM features in game would be identical. That being said it does not exclude the C and C+ from receiving buffs.
2 Likes
Hope they will fix C , C+ for real.
2 Likes
Aim54C and C+ with their mk60 rocket motor would be a very nice change since they are supposed to be smokeless. Idk how much the mk60 would impact actual missile performance though.
5 Likes
Then our protest continues
6 Likes
C , C+ should have capability to shoot down all aspect first. The signal should be PD not CW.
8 Likes
Repeat for the 11000th time.
The 54s are wrong ANYWAY.
54C and 54C+ are 5 mach missiles …and about their behaviour Mk60 engines should be overtaken by Mk47 the time they hit 10-30km distance depending on altitude. The flight pattern is wrong. In 54Cs in general.
The 17G single plane overload is 25G dual.
For R27 they made it from 35G dual, 35G single , they didn’t make it 25 single plane.
But Phoenix stays nerfed… and my card stays in the wallet as well.
11 Likes
Aim 54C+ added and cobra is chat banned
15 Likes
Not added, renamed only (for the moment) .
C+ is still screwed but The ‘undercover gaijin dev’ is banned.
12 Likes
True but I think they’ll do right hopefully
1 Like
I believe that it was Mk. 47 mod that introduced low smoke motor due to new propellant.
And how does that relate to anything I said in my message?
Until they give the F-14D the AIM-7Ps and fix its upgraded radar system, I’m not going to take the jet seriously or even consider buying it.
6 Likes
When is the update dropping?
AIM-54C+ missing upgrades bug report
Currently it’s a copy-paste version of the AIM-54C and different only in name, let’s make sure it’s implemented correctly!
6 Likes
We wait! I believe they’ll do “something”.
They overthink things that are… easy. Very easy.
You keep 54A to 17G -because from what i understand they can’t still showcase it’s real drawbacks .
Get 54C and 54C+ realistic FM and speed and G overload. Change 54C+ radar to AMRAAM (it is wrong , but quickfix …it’s not that they model all those ARHs correctly so at least 54C and 54C+ have a difference) .
Then you can keep 14A as is at 12,7 .
Get 14B at 13.0 because even with the updates with 9M and a realistic 54C AWG-9 isn’t even modelled correctly and not even modelled with its own upgrades , so it can stay as is for the moment.
And get 14D at 13,3 but with valid and good enough armament to match the 13.3 premiums.
It still won’t be OP or something… just a bit niche with 54s range, but they will still lack in agility/closer range vs the more modern R77 and AMRAAMs and MICAs.
7 Likes
You are focusing on the wrong thing with this. Instead of asking for improvements to the C+ model we should be asking for improvements to the baseline C as it would translate to C+ aswell.
13 Likes