Really impressive lol
We’ve gone off track. This doesn’t negate the fact that the Su-30AMV is statistically weak and the Phoenix is currently too strong. It needs to be nerfed asap.
If it’s too strong next update, it should just climb in br. It is more accurate than before.
13.3 is unplayable for tomcats. only turn rate’s nerf will help. I don’t want to see him die on 13.3
Depending on the missile performances, also 13.3 won’t change anything.
The F-14D will have a negative ratio since it’s a premium too, when it happens should we buff the missile? put the F-14D and B at 12.7? put the F-14B at 13.3 because it’s 'better" because of the ratio when it’s actually worse? what do we do there.
No. It will in brace with the EF and F15 GE, and SU30SM at 14.3. These, due to their strong launch characteristics, wont let you launch and DL the Aim54c. this will destroy this jet
As said before, it depends on how the missile performs in practice. There is also supposed to be another buff coming. Besides, those matchups are relatively rare, since these aircraft are being uptiered because they can still fight 14.7s.
I have about 1500 games on 13.3. And in 50% of them youll get one or two EF, SU30SM, GE.
Thats why Im saying Aim54c needs to be in the game. The developers and players will see the results. And I hope they make the right decision about nerfing aim54c, rather than increasing br’s.
It probably will not be nerfed unless documents prove otherwise. Also, your personal experience does not necessarily represent the average matchmaker. Since 14.7 is the most played top-tier bracket, you are less likely to fight 14.3s consistently. Especially as a 13.3.
Pl12 nerfs doesnt exist
Officially they don’t, they fixed a bug and it made the missile worse somehow, the PL-12 is not the only missile to suffer from it either.
What are you saying? They literally nerf the missle autopilot. And only for PL12/PL12A.
And they hardly have documents about the rocket software.
that is not true in the patch notes that concerned the Pl-12 they said this:
no other missile was mentioned
That is unrelated. We were talking about whether the changes are supported by documents. Those nerfs are not quantified by documents either, so bringing them up does not really answer the point. Also it’s a missile.
The nerfs either used documentations or can’t be quantified by documentation.
i was correcting the point of them fixing a “bug”
bc the autopilot change wasnt the result of a bug imo
which i was trying to support by the fact that they have linked bug reports for the other 2 changes
There is no way to prove that for sure. Considering Gaijin’s history, both spaghetti code and hidden nerfs are plausible explanations.
as are your words about the error. autopilot change is a nerf and has no documentation.
This is total related. They changed the missle settings and changed them in a really terrible way without any report. Mean they can nerf aim54c in this way.
You can check this:PL15 for China - #54 by cobra73
He is an F-14 hater, and they abuse the Su-30 MKK. If the F-14D gets buffed it might affect their K/D [POLL] F-14D Should Be a Tech Tree Addition to the US Aviation Tree - #133 by HazelPam69 I’m not bashing the guy but they just don’t want to engage with the community in a positive way so don’t waste your time

