@MrBombastic8
I’ve never lied.
Sharing genuine perspectives is honesty and sincerity.
I make almost exclusively cold takes. Sometimes they’re poorly written and people falsely interpret my positions as the opposite, but I’ve gotten better at typing since due to that.
It’s bad faith to tell others not to converse with others, BTW.
Especially when you’re telling people to ignore critics. I’ve never once seen you say to ignore those provoking others; I’ve only ever seen you attack critics.
Does not create spall. It functions similarly to the autoloader, eating spall every now and then, not producing it. Its not enough to make a difference every shot, but it 100% does not create spall in-game (not in the protection/hit analysis).
No, there were weirdos who wanted it because they want realism in a video game. As soon as the casual players got wind of it, they protested, but Gaijin ignored the casuals for the extreme vocal minority that want this game to be the closest thing to a simulator to appease their “I’d join the military but” complex.
What he’s saying is that the way the the Abrams plays has not changed at all. Aside from the odd-LFP shot not spalling before, the Abrams really hasn’t changed. The Leo however, has.
Don’t get me wrong, I do not advocate for these changes.
I mean lets be honest mate Its made the abrams and leos far more survivable now.
Exactly my bloody point, had countless people telling me it actively generates spall when im sitting watching it soak it
I’m still needing a hand to put together a test with it and check just how much it can soak, cause NGL its worked wonders on my M1A2 and less so the sep V1
they still die in the same amount of hits most the time but I’ve had the turret basket just eat spall and my L27 just does sod all meaning I’m having to put half a dozen darts through the same crew to kill them
ok ykw i play quite a few bloody game again and i can say that
its a 50/50
i die ufp absolutely every single time
but sometime
it ate(side scrap, side shot, angle shot, idler wheel shot, etc…)
but then
getting cripple suck absolute scheibe
BUT
it does spall a second cone
Yes, remove them, and then either increase the HP of the Soviet tanks’ autoloaders, or remove them so they can no longer be broken.
There is no equivalence between the two mechanics.
So you want it to be a permanent spall liner that only slightly affects your horizontal traverse until repaired.
That’s a nice way to make a nerf into a substantial buff.
BECAUSE THATS WHAT IT IS IN REAL LIFE
Good thing that we’re playing WT.
yes but its “unrealistic” then
basket shouldnt be mark as traverse in the first place
it should act like a spall liner
thats the sole reason why its made of thin aluminum sheet that can deal with shrapnel
And WT is known to have absolutely zero unrealistic things.
yes but thats not the reason to refusing changing something that is terribly baked
you cant have a recipe on how to bake and gave up mid way and let it burn
It was intended as a nerf to vehicles that could just shrug off center mass side shots like it’s nothing.
i mean ik its a nerf either way but the way they do it is just sadistic
