please for the love of God give the phantom fgr2 its aim9ls already
1 Like
What about Battle Of Hurtgen Forest?
What about Breslau Carpathians?
What about Eastern Europe?
What about Flanders?
What about Fulda?
What about Golden Quarry?
What about Maginot Line?
What about Mozdok?
What about North Holland?
What about Sinai?
What about Tunisia?
What about Vietnam?
What about European Province?
What about Fields Of Poland?
What about Poland?
What about Pradesh?
What about Red Desert?
What about Sands Of Sinai?
What about Spaceport?
What about Surroundings Of Volokolamsk?
Vehicle:CA-27 Mk.23
Gamemode:Air Realistic
BR Change:9.3 ->9.0
Reason: The CA-27’s performance in Air Realistic is close to that of the CL-13B, and is far weaker than the 9.3 BR supersonic aircraft, or subsonic aircraft such as the Hunter, Aries, and F3H.It should be at the same BR as the CL-13B.
5 Likes
Almost all of these have been cut down to CoD arenas, not tank maps.
2 Likes
i could also make a list thats just as long if not longer of maps that are around or less than 1.5km x 1.5km
not to mention the BMPTs spread doesnt honestly change much under 1~1.5km anyways
Air Realistic:
B-66B: 9.0 → 8.7
With the vVautours moving down last time, I think it’s only fair this one does to. No offensive armament, No countermeasures and subsonic 0.3 below Mach 2 fighters with missiles. Not to mention it doesn’t get an airspawn
Why the HQ 11 Will have to be 13.3 What if it only has 8 missiles and not 48 like the Panairt SM SV or 16 like the SAMPT, Irist, or other anti-aircraft guns? Besides, dodging the HQ 11 is extremely easy. Then there’s the f15ge, because this would go to 15.0 and not 14.7 like the su30sm, mk ir the j10c?, The Su-30SM has the same number of missiles and, to top it off, it also has better ones, as well as a better flight model. The J-10C is the same, fewer missiles but a very good flight model, and above all The planes I mentioned, ALL OF THEM, ABSOLUTELY ALL OF THEM, accelerate better than the F-15 Golden Eagle
1 Like
Then do it. It would only be 4–5 maps, and some maps are only available at lower BRs anyway.
im talking about any cas plane exept top tier 15.0 planes and even for them itd be hard they u get 10 SP point for pantsir s1 and 20 for any other tank
That’s just not true. Some areas are CQC but I wouldn’t call any of them purely CQC.
As for the BMPTs, their survivability should be nerfed to normal MBT levels, and then be placed at 11.0ish.
Nah the Alouette is one of the most evil helicopters in the game. The missiles aren’t exactly amazing but it can just chill 3km away from the battlefield, and the silly machine guns can do surprising amounts of damage when you inevitably have to deal with enemy aircraft
so stupid.
why bring up the STB-2 and the Type 74 C uptier wherein these two do not have APFSDS?
even the STB-2 does not have HEAT? idiots
1 Like
The BMPT and Su-30MK / Su-30MKK need a higher BR.
Nothing has really changed with the BMPT. All Br 10.7 vehicles are being adjusted to 11.0, right? It’s still just as chaotic as ever. Why do the developers underestimate the BMPT? Do they even play the game? Honestly, the BMPT would perform just fine even if it went up to 13.0.
And there’s a lot to be said about the Premium Su-30s, too. They should have been raised to 13.7 a long time ago—especially now that the cap is 14.7. If they raise the cap to 15.0 and adjust the Premium Su-30s to 13.7, wouldn’t that just end up being the exact same situation as now? It’s still a 0.3 increase, after all.
These planes need to be set to 14.0.
Don’t spout that “it’s fine because they face each other” nonsense like last time—it’s complete bullshit. Anyone watching would think every matched game is filled exclusively with Su-30s. We do face other aircraft too—it’s total bullshit.
Try flying the Premium F-2. You’ll face Su-30s.
Try flying the Premium Hornet. You’ll face Su-30s.
Or what… are you just making adjustments based on statistics?
You guys know full well that statistics aren’t reliable, right? You haven’t forgotten about the Italian CL-13 Mk4 incident, have you? 🤣
4 Likes
Can AMX40 really be compared to Leopard 2k? I think the poor experience of AMX40 should not increase its brbattlerating. Or at least it need some upgrade, such as adding new shells.
1 Like
Air Sim F-16XL – 13.0 → 13.7, not 13.3:
4x AMRAAM + 2x AIM-9L is not that impressive for 13.7, however it more than makes up for it with its flight performance and avionics suite.
It already needed to be moved to 13.3 before decompression, same as the Kfir C.10, but with decompression on top of that they should both go to 13.7. And yet the Kfir gets moved to 13.7 but the F-16XL, the better plane, doesn’t? If anything, it should be the other way around.
2 Likes
Please lower the br of kfir C.7(12.0) and kurnass 2000(12.3)
The kfir C.7 gets 4 python 3 and kurnass 2000 gets 6 python 3 a non ircm IR missile
And no radar in case of kfir C.7
yet they’re facing f4s and f18 with better radar more and better missiles and sarh missiles and better flight model
They also face mirage 2000 that have magic 2 an ircm missile which is one of the best maneuvering missile in the game at 12.3
It’s not even a fight both of them are unplayable at their current br because of what they’re facing at their br
Buccaneer S.2B Ground RB
10.7(current) → 11.0
The current suggest Br change of 10.7 to 11.7 means that the Buccaneer will be raised to 1 Br step below spaa such as the Adats, and 2 br steps below the Pantsir, which due to the popularity of those Br’s, the Buccaneer will almost always fight those spaa with, at best, 4 mediocre ARM’s and 4 dumb bombs (at the expense of any other kind of guided Air-to-Ground or Air-to-Air weapons), let alone any enemy fighters.
Whilst the capabilities of the Buccaneer S.2B, with the addition of MITL and ARM’s may require a BR raise, a raise of an entire BR bracket will, in my opinion, kill the Bucc, not only due to the competent Spaa it faces, which it already struggles with in its current Br bracket, due to the low number of Air-to-Ground weapons and low speed of the weapons and the Buccaneer, but also due to the fact the number of players using the Bucc will fall dramatically due to the vastly superior opposition, meaning it is unlikely to be lowered in Br post change any time soon.
3 Likes
Why are the 2s38 and t80ud not going from 10.7 to 11.0 like the rest
Their br were increased for a reason they should move up like the rest of others
7 Likes
Re.2005
Ground battles:
Re.2005 Serie 0: 6.3 → 6.7
Re.2005 (VDM): 6.3 → 6.7
Air Battles:
Re.2005 Serie 0: 6.3 → 6.0
Re.2005 VDM: Unchanged
Much like the A6M and spitfire series, the Re-2005 is much more effective in ground battles due to the nature of the battlefield. Whilst the spitfire and A6Ms are going up in BR in ground but remaining the same in air, I think a similar treatment should be applied to the Re.2005. The 6.3 raise in the last round of changes probably didn’t consider the distinction between the two modes in the statistics, as the Re.2005 struggles at 6.3 in Air RB, competing with the likes of the P-51H and Ta-152-C3. I think the series 0 was balanced at 6.0 in air. The VDM has more power, so it makes sense to be a higher BR. But if it has to go down too that’s fine.
1 Like
Tbf, the MG3s aren’t a threat at all if you don’t take it in a level headon. Even a rank 1 plane can just come from above. Alouette can’t follow you vertical without losing alot of altitude and potentially crashing.
If I had to guess, the only real reason the Alouette gets so much hate is because it’s the only helicopter players commonly will die to. Russia is stuck with Falangas, and Hueys have terrible zoom, leaving Germany as the only major nation with a competitive early chopper.