Give the CM and AM’s at least 120B to correct this problem atp. It’s crazy most of the Fox 3 16’s have only 120A
Aim-120A and Aim-120B are 100% identical.
Literally the only difference is the name.
3 Likes
Why is the SK-105A2 being moved to 9.0 and the German JaPz.K A2 staying at 8.7?
They’re the exact same vehicle.
6 Likes
still i wonder why they chose to add the 120A when they could’ve just added 120B to everything instead
I dont mind the “early” stuff having the As alongside the 9Ls. But anything with 9Ms should probably have the Bs. But definetly a case of them doubling the workload of the sake of a single letter
If the AGS is being put at higher br(again), at least give it M900 or something. M1128 has it at like 8.7. Also there is no reason to put Obj 292 at 11.3. No machine guns, bad armor for it’s tier, no reactive armor or APS systems.
2 Likes
(GRB) T44: 6.7–6.3
A tank with an extremely weak gun and strong sway, which makes it ineffective against most opponents in its combat rating.
(GRB) M26: 6.7–6.3
A tank with not the best armor and mobility compared to other American tanks at 6.7; its performance is highly questionable.
4 Likes
Because people get misinformed
Which gaijin thrives on
In game sure but not IRL because they haven’t fixed it yet :(
USA
F-5E
Ground Realistic
11.3 → 11.0
Slow airframe, no all aspects, no radar missiles, no ballistics computers, no anti-rad, and only four AGM-65Bs.
Raising the F-5E to 11.3 was already stupid. How tf did Gajin come to the conclusion it belongs at 11.7?
2 Likes
To be more specific in the guidance department
I don’t know where you got “M1128” and “8.7” from
3 Likes
The differences arent known well enough to report and the differences would be hardly noticable even if they were.
Its mostly ground maintanence and software differences iirc
1 Like
If we’re being honest idk why we don’t have 120C-7 for either (or anything aircraft wise) yet. The AM and CM would both have those and 120B/A. Also IIRC it was mainly lofting profile and smoothing of guidance inputs.
1 Like
Classic Zero idea…
A2D is actually pretty good after drop bombs; for F89, just use speed and head-on
And it is GRB
1 Like
Agreed.
I am heavily considering purchasing Duke of York, but the prospect of facing 8.7s constantly is REALLY holding me back.
Naval Top Tier NEEDS decompression.
Current 8.7s have no business facing 8.0s, let alone 7.7s
Am I really to spend 70 bucks on a 8.0 that is going to be ravaged by Soyuzs and Iowas while it can barely scratch them…?
1 Like
They honestly should just remake all the naval BR’s atp. Even during the naval beta and release they were compressed to hell. BMO was op as hell good lord. I remember being in a PT-6 and getting murdered by them.
Alpha E(France)
GRB 9.0- 8,7
No flares, no APHE, so no reason to stay the same BR with Alpha jets (Gemany/Thailand)
4 Likes
RN Roma (NRB 8.3 - 8.3) Reloading for the main caliber cannons should be changed from 45 s aced to more adequate average value of 30 s or below. Currently ships of Littorio class (RN Italia as well) are inferior compared to their competitors, showing much worse results in battles, one of the main reasons is rate of fire.
3 Likes
After 5.3, the whole Naval BR system is crashed, Des Moines VS Duke of York if it is 7.7 XD