Talking about bias when you only play russians ??? LOL
Leopard A1A1
Ground Realistic battles
8.7 → 9.0 Full stab leopard with APFSDS is disgustingly OP and shouldnt be the same BR as a olifant mk1
Why Br increase? It will be fine at 11.3 with just 4 all aspect Missiles, the Mig-21-2000 is at 11.7 with Pythons tahta re way better
agreed but this is better than nothing
I’m gonna need a Gaijin Staffmember to explain to me how the 2A6 and Leclercs are 13.0s but the clickbait etc. are 12.3
Naval AB
R-130 - 1.7>1.3
After 2yrs+ the 3.7cm flak mount still fires off target resulting in a significant reduction in reliable firepower.
Alternatively… FIX IT!
I have all nations researched to at very least 4.7, the lowest being Germans (6.0 rn bad players in teams ngl) and Brits (4.7 slow and fat). All else is at 8.3 minimum.
Russia 12.7
France 11.0
Italy 11.7
Sweden 11.3 (if TT only 9.3)
USA 11.7
Japan 8.3
China 11.7
Outrange??? It’ll just shoot them down easily, you know how SLOW martels are… ur joking, even rolands have 0 issues shooting down martels in battles. With these changes bucc is nothing but useless RP wall towards what…why even bother to go for that line at all now
Thank you for finally decompressing the BRs a bit
Now we need much more top tier light tanks for those nations
Honestly, J-15T and the F-15C don’t belong at 15.0. They’re a whole BR step below the top dogs, so 14.7 is where they actually make sense. Gaijin, please.
when it became real
Decompression huh? Peak, though too bad 12.0 won’t enjoy it
Vehicle: F3H-2
Gamemode: Air Realistic Battles
BR Change: 9.0/9.3 → 9.7
Reason: After the AIM-7 Sparrow missile remodels this plane significantly benefitted from this change and is now overperforming in its current battle rating. The missile becomes difficult to evade (and difficult to spot as most planes have no RWRs at brs around this plane and the missile has a short burn period making it incredibly difficult to spot outside spotting system ranges) at higher altitude and that discourages people from climbing up in Air RB matches which offers less variety in gameplay and less room for positioning around a team.
Kfir and MiG-29N still being the same br as the prem flankers is goofy lmao
Why were the A-10A Late, F-4E, and F-111F moved up to such high BRs? Is it simply because they have Mavericks? The balance seems really strange. Ground pounding in these aircraft is going to be extremely unpleasant, and I don’t understand the point of changing their BRs.
Finally! BR decompression! … Looks inside … Air is increasing by a whole 0.3 BR… Why even bother? You need more room for granular changes, Gaijin, please understand going up by a single bracket, and moving everything up at the same time, will only marginally fix the balancing issues. Now compression exists at a different point, and many of the vehicles moving up now, are already suffering at their current BR, and don’t need moving.
Vehicle: M1A1 Clickbait
Gamemode: Ground Realistic
BR Change: 12.0 —> 12.3/12.7
Reason: The M1A1 Clickbait has access to the M829A2 round which is the second best round at top tier, coupled with the 5 second reload this arguably gives the M1A2 the best fire power at top tier, and yet it is only at 12.3. Coupled with its excellent mobility and perfectly capable survivability, this MBT stands well ahead of anything else at 12.0 currently and could even be considered the equal to several MBTs currently located at 12.7. An increase to 12.7 is the bare minimum required. I am unaware of any meaningful differences between the M1A1 HC Clickbait and the M1A2 SepV1 which is currently a 12.7 MBT. The only difference I can see is the M1A1 HC Clickbait has APS and a slightly weaker thermal gen. The APS is a minimal advantage, which only really leaves the thermal sight difference. Whilst this could warrant them being at different BRs, this was not enough to justify the Leopard 2A6 and the Leopard 2A7 to be separate BRs and there are greater differences in performance between those MBTs as far as I am aware.
Vehicle: M1A1 HC
Gamemode: Ground Realistic
BR Change: 12.3 —> 13.0
Reason: The M1A1 HC has access to the M829A2 round which is the second best round at top tier, coupled with the 5 second reload this arguably gives the M1A2 the best fire power at top tier, and yet it is only at 12.3. Coupled with its excellent mobility and perfectly capable survivability, this MBT stands well ahead of anything else at 12.3 currently and could even be considered the equal to several MBTs currently located at 13.0. An increase to 12.3 is the bare minimum required. I am unaware of any meaningful differences between the M1A1 HC and the M1A2 SepV1 which is currently a 13.3 MBT. The only difference I can see is the M1A1 HC has APS and a slightly weaker thermal gen. The APS is a minimal advantage, which only really leaves the thermal sight difference. Whilst this could warrant them being at different BRs, this was not enough to justify the Leopard 2A6 and the Leopard 2A7 to be separate BRs and there are greater differences in performance between those MBTs as far as I am aware.
