It is.
Bro, the Gripen E has an amazing flight model and it beats an EF2K in a dogfight.
lol bro didn’t bring up the bmp-3 stats I wonder why.
And yes I have a lot more time behind the Russian light tanks, no duh. Therefore I’ll be better in them.
If you’d like me to grind the Beglit I could triple its KDr with ease
In the case of the bmd-4M I spam played it when it came out. Hardly have touched it since.
Using your suggestion as a scenario, lets say the begleit goes to 10.3. Now, its in a matchmaker where every single soviet MBT is equipped with either contact 1/5 ERA. Congratulations, I guess you’re right, it is a “skill issue” when your primary anti-tank weapon can no longer do ANY damage to opposing vehicles since it isn’t a tandem warhead. I was incorrect that you’re blissfully ignorant, you’re just outright ignorant.
Oh, and just to throw in another factoid, once the T72B3 gets lowered to 11.3, what should a begleit do against a tank with RELICT ERA with it’s ITOW?
Chieftain 900 and Chieftain Mk. 10 (9.0) → 9.0 in GRB.
That’s correct, they should stay on their BR: they have good armor but much slower than analogues from other nations. It will make difficult to use them against modern MBTs like T-80, because 9.3 plays against 10.3-10.0 most of the time.
Doesn’t matter, dogfights don’t matter in top tier air rb, otherwise F-2A would be spanking everything and would deserve to be at 14.7. Missile kits and overall climb/acceleration performance is what matters more. The regular Su-30SM is better than Gripen E overall, so by that standard the Su-30SM should go up too? Nonsense.
I had someone argue with me and say the begleit is comparable to the bmp3 bc both have an atgm and the begleit has a better gun. And he told me it was irrelevant that the begleit couldnt fire the atgm on the move. Anyone who thinks the begleit is comprarable to the russian monsters is just lying
You’re wrong and seemingly couldnt be bothered to test it (why would you verify what you say afterall)
Even 5.56mm MG’s are sufficient, because the breech-module has 0mm of effective armour.
They’re extermely good for observation without exposing your vehicle. Just because you dont utilize the commander-sight often doesnt mean it isnt a considerable advantage.
Again, its extremely useful in the right situations against vehicles without thermals, which can be used together with thermals to gain a considerable advantage.
Also just flat out wrong, APHE still has significantly higher fragmentation count, angular distribution and the same fragment damage as APCBC (if you desperately need it, I can link the changelog that proves the fragment damage being the same).
Once again 2S38 also has APFSDS, I am solely mentioning the APHE so much because its the worse option on 2S38 but already significantly better than the best option on Begleit.
Thank you. Finally someone who uses their head.
Because your stats are so bad in it that it could easily count as statshaming.
go for it.
Among other things, yes.
Despite the gun/ammo being worse in every single way but RoF
What exactly is it good at? Slow, huge traget, no survivability, cannon is trash (0.5s is not fast enough to effectively disable cannons), cannot go hull down… Bmp-2m is better at everything and now it’s lower br
Its the best utility platform in the game by a far margin.
Actual skill issue if you’re struggling against that turd. Like how???
No it’s not lol.
Mode: Air Realistic Battles
Aircraft: XP-55
Changes:
- 4.3 → 4.0
- Remove 2 x 20mm cannons and replace those with another 2 x 0.50 cal guns.
Reasoning: XP-55 was historically never meant to use 20mm cannons, as stated in my bug report. With the loss of cannons, lowering BR would be more fair for those owners.
Because it is, there is no reason for it to even move higher up, they don’t compare in the slightest with the 2S38. You are deranged.
Name a better utility platform then?
bro?




^this one takes the undertiered cake as it gets the goated m728 apds shell AND heat at 8.0 lmao
the TTS in question:

it can actually tank 3bm25 very well btw
