“I only play nato countries, so I want to nerf my enemies, because my skill isnt enough to counter average enemy player, but when Russian kills me, I feel insulted from gaijin, because its not as “they” told me”
1 Like
Quite the disingenuous TLDR to wrap up a disingenuous argument.
Anyway.
Holy german main
5 Likes
So the Netz Mod and F-15A Baz are going to be the same BR? What???
No need to take the 2S38 to 10.7，compared to Italy’s Freccia，its ability is far too weak.
1 Like
you can play defensive tanks that are armored aggresive too you know ? the TURM III is a shoot and scoot tank its a better leo 1 basically def should be 8.7
Python-3 = OP :P
(dont look at SB ratings if you dont want to completely lose it)
1 Like
Vehicle: Falcon
Gamemode: Ground Realistic
BR Change: 8.3 → 7.7
Reason: since the APDS is getting removed there is no reason anymore to keep it that high, at 8.3 it would be at the same BR as the Gepard(and many other AAs) which gets an Radar + its Emergency APDS ammo
6 Likes
Mode: Ground Realistic Battles
Vehicle: Lvrbv 701
9.7 > 9.3
Reasoning: The Lvrbv 701 is outclassed by most other SPAAs at its BR, with its only advantage being range. However, it struggles to make use of said range, as it lacks any means of easily detecting aircraft. It is best used against helicopters, but at 9.7, it starts facing helicopters that can hover close to its maximum range. This wouldn’t be an issue if it carried a search radar or IRST, but having to visually identify targets makes it significantly harder to use. Additionally, it is entirely outranged by helicopters in any sort of uptier, which, at 9.7, is not uncommon.
When faced with planes, it once again suffers due to its inability to quickly spot them. The Lvrbv 701’s poor turret traverse and limited elevation angles make it ineffective against most aircraft it will face, as they either climb too high or stay too low and close to be targeted efficiently.
When compared to SPAAs at its BR it is mediocre at best, when compared to anything higher BR it is entirely obsolete. With several other SAMs already found at lower BRs, I do not believe lowering the Lvrbv 701’s BR will suddenly make it broken, simply slightly more useable. You will still have to rely on eyeballs mk1 to spot and engage targets. (Not to mention that the French Roland is ALSO at 9.7, and it is better in most ways.)
Additionally, at 9.3 it would fit much nicer into a lineup, as currently the Strf 9040B is the only other 9.7 ground vehicle Sweden has access to, ignoring premiums.
3 Likes
The Freccia and 2S38 are not good comparisons. They’re not alike in the slightest.
Besides, how can the T64B compare with the T72B or even the T72B1989?
Just a worse rapier at the same BR
And Sufa is going 13.0 in ground RB, because it’s definitely better than other F16’s and the same as EF,SU,Rafale etc.
Total joke.
1 Like
Nothing disingenuous about pointing out pilot error.
Saying the 15 can’t hold a lock and using a video showcasing the pilot having a spasm, then blaming the plane, is disingenuous.
Anyways.
1 Like
still moving them up in br will just create more gaps
It is way more uncommon as their radars are stronger.
Sparrows depend on solid, continous illumination as they don’t have IOG in case of losing a lock.
The F-15A has a worse radar than the F/A-18A/F-20.
Well yeah i know i can, but because it is slower, i will not be as aggressive as in Turm, and i did say it should go higher (about Turm), if they want to put T-62 on 9.0 go ahead, imo it is not nessesery, but Turm for sure should go higher.
Doesnt even look like the Pilots fault. I have never ever seen a missile behave that way on anything ive ever played. And no maneuver should change that. To me, it looked like the missiles totally bugged out.
All it needs is a bug report
2 Likes
Tell me where’s the beyblade spin at the first Sparrow launch.
There’s none. The missile just decided to go to Narnia. That’s exactly being disingenuous.
The discussion was the radar, not the missile.