isn’t that just common Sparrow behavior, even that kind of thing happen on Hornet and Tigershark
You realize that manouvering all over the place and spinning like a top like on that video is what causes the lock to be lost?
The radar needs time to move and stabilize… you will drop a lock on almost every plane that doesn’t have a ESA radar if you move like that.
2 Likes
do you use the datalink feature or simply fnf them?
That is false, as long as you keep your lock within the radar’s cone and your target doesn’t notch, it shouldn’t lose lock on PD.
I’ve got several SARH kills while maneuvering with the F/A-18A.
Moving F-15’s to 12.7 only creates more toxic compression:
- F-15A/F-15AJ at 12.7 have better kit than F-16AJ at 12.7.
- F-16AJ if moved to 12.3 has better kit than F-16A at 12.3.
- F-16A, F-16AJ and F-15A/F-15AJ create immense pressure on 11.7-12.0.
Don’t move F-15’s to 12.7, instead move 13.3-13.7 planes with ARH +0.3.
2 Likes
me163B/B-0
needs either a drop in br
or
be given its 55k ft climb rate
I just see a need for a bug report not a BR drop
Tiger E: GRB 6.0 > 5.7
Tiger H1 GRB 5.7 >5.3
Panther A, G, F GRB 6.0 > 5.7
Tiger II Nr.1-50 GRB 6.7 > 6.3
Zerstörer 45 GRB 6.0 > 5.7
KV-IB GRB 4.3 > 4.0
KW I C 756 (r) GRB 5.0 > 4.7
Leopard 1 GRB 8.0 > 7.7
Sd.Kfz 234/2 move to rank III
StuG III G move rank III
Sd.Kfz.251/21 move to rank III
Pz.IV H / J move rank III
they could leave tiger E where it is if it had the add on armor
What
The radar illuminating a target has nothing to do with the radar tracking a target
Just because you can do this on one plane doesn’t mean every radar set will act that way
Try to lock a target while turning or banked a bit on the su-27/mig-29. Or holding a target while inverted… Good luck.
TLDR stop being a beyblade and the 15 locks just fine
1 Like
T-62 is still a strong tank and it shouldn’t go lower because Turm III is 8.3 and is better than it. Turm should go 8.7 or 9.0, not other way around. Those tanks fulfill a different purpose, T-62 is armored, so it can survive some hits if player makes mistake, Turm on the other hand is basicly a light tank, not good armor, but great gun, secondary canon and fast reload, plus mobility lets you play very aggressive with it, while T-62 is more of a defensive tank.
“I only play nato countries, so I want to nerf my enemies, because my skill isnt enough to counter average enemy player, but when Russian kills me, I feel insulted from gaijin, because its not as “they” told me”
1 Like
Quite the disingenuous TLDR to wrap up a disingenuous argument.
Anyway.
Holy german main
4 Likes
So the Netz Mod and F-15A Baz are going to be the same BR? What???
No need to take the 2S38 to 10.7，compared to Italy’s Freccia，its ability is far too weak.
1 Like
you can play defensive tanks that are armored aggresive too you know ? the TURM III is a shoot and scoot tank its a better leo 1 basically def should be 8.7
Python-3 = OP :P
(dont look at SB ratings if you dont want to completely lose it)
1 Like
Vehicle: Falcon
Gamemode: Ground Realistic
BR Change: 8.3 → 7.7
Reason: since the APDS is getting removed there is no reason anymore to keep it that high, at 8.3 it would be at the same BR as the Gepard(and many other AAs) which gets an Radar + its Emergency APDS ammo
6 Likes
Mode: Ground Realistic Battles
Vehicle: Lvrbv 701
9.7 > 9.3
Reasoning: The Lvrbv 701 is outclassed by most other SPAAs at its BR, with its only advantage being range. However, it struggles to make use of said range, as it lacks any means of easily detecting aircraft. It is best used against helicopters, but at 9.7, it starts facing helicopters that can hover close to its maximum range. This wouldn’t be an issue if it carried a search radar or IRST, but having to visually identify targets makes it significantly harder to use. Additionally, it is entirely outranged by helicopters in any sort of uptier, which, at 9.7, is not uncommon.
When faced with planes, it once again suffers due to its inability to quickly spot them. The Lvrbv 701’s poor turret traverse and limited elevation angles make it ineffective against most aircraft it will face, as they either climb too high or stay too low and close to be targeted efficiently.
When compared to SPAAs at its BR it is mediocre at best, when compared to anything higher BR it is entirely obsolete. With several other SAMs already found at lower BRs, I do not believe lowering the Lvrbv 701’s BR will suddenly make it broken, simply slightly more useable. You will still have to rely on eyeballs mk1 to spot and engage targets. (Not to mention that the French Roland is ALSO at 9.7, and it is better in most ways.)
Additionally, at 9.3 it would fit much nicer into a lineup, as currently the Strf 9040B is the only other 9.7 ground vehicle Sweden has access to, ignoring premiums.
3 Likes