Su-24M
11.3 to 11.0
reason :
bad fligh performance while having r60m, basicly a su22m4 with less cms and 4 r60m instead of 6.
not to forget it cant go destroy bases as it spawn at 500kmh while fast plane like mig23 with spaw at mach and get all bases
Looks fine to me.
when is the hawk 209 getting its extra missiles and other changes as accepted by the bug report system?
Anyways
Air RB
Q-5A/Q-5L
10.0 to 9.7, because of their lack of A2A missiles, and them being a side grade to a 9.3, they deserve a lower BR. They should not be the same BR as something like the Hunter F.58, or just below the J35XS or F-8U.
Nuke carrier from 7.7 onwards
B29 → B57
Tu-4 → IL-28
Now that both jets are 7.7 in GRB they should also replace the nuke carriers at these BRs
nobody tell him there’s a centurion with the same dart and lrf, but also ERA, very good gun handling, and actual somewhat plausible mobility at 8.7
VT5
Ground RB
Add BTA2 (DTC02) APFSDS
At 11.7, the VT5 is literally equal to or worse than the Type 90 in all regards. It lacks meaningful armor protection (which is fine) but needs to offset this with greater firepower, as its mobility is not appreciably higher than some of the MBTs it faces. Other improved munitions would also be welcome.
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/DUe6x3EXFyTn
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/Gtb4pIaviv3f
mans speaking straight facts right there
Panzerjäger I Ausf.B: Add 4,7 cm Sprgr.36 (t) (HE round) it has no MG and the HE round has 180g TnT/Np.10 Filler, which without higher TnT equivalent already is 10g higher than the 170g overpressure minimum.
because its played by luddites, in either case it has no business being 0.7 below the other T-34s for a somewhat worse gun, and better mobility
Sherman II
Ground RB
3.7 → 3.3
The Sherman II has all the same weaknesses as the standard M4A1, which the addition of APCR will not fix. While the APCR is a nice bonus, it is by far not the primary round used with the Sherman II, and thus should not be the cause for its raised BR. The APCR could be removed with no consequence.
Also no moving up in BR of T-58?
Tbh, I’d rather these things get the extra KH-25ML on the inner wing pylons, the Kab-500Kr, and the KH-25MT.
Also their RWR prolly has more bandwitdh irl than we think.
They are about as good as the M4A1 75mm that is also 3.3
from 7.3 its better the me262 are deadly against b29s
So just like any other vehicle at that BR ?
yeah the B29 has just no chance against ME262s meteors and F80s at its br
The Sherman II doesn’t have the weak edges
XM246
Ground Realistic
8.3 → 9.0
The Gepardy vehicles have been far too strong for far to long now, both with overperforming APHE, and radar gun SPAA facing 1940s and 50s planes. Sane should apply to the rest of the Gepards.
Wouldn’t send it all the way to 10.0 straight off, but it should definitely go up. The Imp Chap is 9.0/9.3 depending on the version, and some of those have caged Sidewinders only. As opposed the Shigla, with guns, radar, Iglas, the lot.
Definitely 9.7 lowest.