the bots that play it drag it down
evidently the 29G is superior to the 15A
(seriously what are they smoking)
because those SPAAs have APDS in their main belt
their
main belt
not a secondary one like gepard
their main belt
Pz IV F2, Pz IV G,
GRB: 3.3 → 3.7
Strong Vehicles, Their lighter nature compared to Pz IV J, and higher Turret Traverse speed offset the worse armour, they should be moved up as they are very strong at 3.3
Su-24M
11.3 to 11.0
reason :
bad fligh performance while having r60m, basicly a su22m4 with less cms and 4 r60m instead of 6.
not to forget it cant go destroy bases as it spawn at 500kmh while fast plane like mig23 with spaw at mach and get all bases
Looks fine to me.

when is the hawk 209 getting its extra missiles and other changes as accepted by the bug report system?
Anyways
Air RB
Q-5A/Q-5L
10.0 to 9.7, because of their lack of A2A missiles, and them being a side grade to a 9.3, they deserve a lower BR. They should not be the same BR as something like the Hunter F.58, or just below the J35XS or F-8U.
Nuke carrier from 7.7 onwards
B29 → B57
Tu-4 → IL-28
Now that both jets are 7.7 in GRB they should also replace the nuke carriers at these BRs
nobody tell him there’s a centurion with the same dart and lrf, but also ERA, very good gun handling, and actual somewhat plausible mobility at 8.7
VT5
Ground RB
Add BTA2 (DTC02) APFSDS
At 11.7, the VT5 is literally equal to or worse than the Type 90 in all regards. It lacks meaningful armor protection (which is fine) but needs to offset this with greater firepower, as its mobility is not appreciably higher than some of the MBTs it faces. Other improved munitions would also be welcome.
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/DUe6x3EXFyTn
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/Gtb4pIaviv3f
mans speaking straight facts right there
Panzerjäger I Ausf.B: Add 4,7 cm Sprgr.36 (t) (HE round) it has no MG and the HE round has 180g TnT/Np.10 Filler, which without higher TnT equivalent already is 10g higher than the 170g overpressure minimum.

because its played by luddites, in either case it has no business being 0.7 below the other T-34s for a somewhat worse gun, and better mobility
Sherman II
Ground RB
3.7 → 3.3
The Sherman II has all the same weaknesses as the standard M4A1, which the addition of APCR will not fix. While the APCR is a nice bonus, it is by far not the primary round used with the Sherman II, and thus should not be the cause for its raised BR. The APCR could be removed with no consequence.
Also no moving up in BR of T-58?
Tbh, I’d rather these things get the extra KH-25ML on the inner wing pylons, the Kab-500Kr, and the KH-25MT.
Also their RWR prolly has more bandwitdh irl than we think.
They are about as good as the M4A1 75mm that is also 3.3
from 7.3 its better the me262 are deadly against b29s
So just like any other vehicle at that BR ?
