Maybe the Piranha missiles, which are pretty good currently?
Increasing tank BR’s to 12.0 is a great change.
Proposal: Change J35D from 10.3 in RB to 10.0. Its really not better than F8U. Without flares it struggles a lot. Its also not that fast, and if you want to bring 4 missiles you cannot take the external fuel tank, which means you will not be fighting for long.
Change the Shenyang F-5 to 9.0 in Air RB. Its really just a Lim-5 with a 37mm and 2 aim-9b’s. Doesnt deserve to fight against all aspect missiles.
Yes because 10.7 IS 10.7
In my opinion, if Fox is at BR 7.7, then R3 T106 FA should also be at BR 7.7
1 Like
Question @Stona_WT, regarding the changes to the reload rate of the Ariete series and Merkava Mk4 is the now 5 second reload the base reload or the aced reload speed? The doc is a bit ambiguous. Thanks!
RB, OTOMATIC 11.3 > 10.7 (maybe 11.0). Every 10.0+ Helli is just out of its reach just as every 11.3 aircraft is. And against Ground Targets it is like HSTVL just with no HS (High Survivability). It is also not so mobile. It is kind of unplayable rn :(
6 Likes
AIR RB F4J(UK) Phantom II 12.0 > 11.7 reason: its radar guided missiles have a terrible range and gets out performed by most radar guided missiels at its br and even though it has 4 18g ir missiles they struggle in up tiers
Almost certain to be ACED fire rate like every other tank with 5 second reload
APHE autoloaders are a bit OP don’t you think?
Move the Venom from 8.7 to at least 8.3 or even 8.0. Compare it to MiG 15/bis and F86A-5 its really not a better plane. Hispanos dont really work and the acceleration is poor.
It used to be a very competitive plane at higher altitudes but now with missiles in the game it cannot take advantage of that performance. I think the reason for the Venom not being at a lower BR already is the fact that no one is playing it, giving gaijin no data.
1 Like
Same with MiG-21 PFM
1 Like
If you are raising the BRs of 9.3 supersonics like the Su-7, then the F-104 should be going up at least one, maybe two BR brackets. F-104 should not be still facing Yak-30s and F-86s.
Make the F-104A and C at least 9.7, preferably 10.0
Agreed
10.0 is too much without more decompression, but I agree.
Tbh, they moved the M26 at 6.7 few days after it was announced that it will be added in the French tech tree, and i always saw that as a pre nerf. And this is for me the only reasoning behind it going 6.7.
1 Like
Air RB, Bf 109 Z, 4.7 > 4.0, or add air defense fighter spawn. This plane has good climb rate and speed, but this is only advantage it has. The maneuverability of this aircraft is so poor that even bombers like the B-25 are more agile than it. Although it has four MK108s as weapons, it is very difficult to use due to its poor trajectory and velocity, this gives it no advantage against any fighter at same BR unless opponent didn’t notice your attack. In summary, this terrible airplane really needs a lower and more suitable BR to improve its experience, or it should have a air defence fighter spawn like Hornt Mk.III in game.
1 Like
Ground RB, Kugelblitz. 7.0 > 6.7
Instead of standing proudly amongst his mighty colleagues at 6.7 in one of the best lineups in the game, this old, slow and forgotten vehicle is trying to battle the ultra fast jets in the uptier at 8.0. The fate of this vehicle is exactly one of those examples where over-anxiety and the pursuit of balance has absolutely eliminated any enjoyment of the game and the vehicle itself. His position in the tech tree makes no sense and yet it is only a 0.3 difference. Please let’s take this vehicle back to where it belongs at 6.7 and give it its purpose again.
11 Likes
Should the F-4E Phantom II’s battle rating be lowered?
A-4E from 8.7 to 8.3 → because it’s not fast enough to reach enemy bases in time and it’s not maneuverable enough to dogfight enemy planes and becomes very vulnerable