Since I have run out of like I am commenting, but I agree, I think they shoud both go to 9.7 and get XM774,
they both have the manouvrabilty and still both have good survivabilty and would be fine at that BR.
ok bagholder lmfao
M109 from 6.0 to 6.7
They outpefrom slow WWII vehicles, have the best armor (no armor) and a gun that oneshoots anything
Maybe actually do a suggestion and not a “stop killing of OP vehicles whine”
The Magic 2s that the Jagaur gets makes it very potent as a multi-role in GRB. You cannot do nearly as good of a job with the AMX.
I have, you just haven’t seen it.
I could show you a video that shows that you have skill issues
Ground RB, Ariete PSO. 11.7 → 11.3. The worst mbt of the game, 0 armor, and slower among others mbts. This could be the moment to decompress italy and make it competitive vs other nations. The 5 seconds reload is not enough to justify this higher br
The Tonka is much better the Magic 2s don’t really help
Vehicle in question: Sholef
Vehicle changes: 7.3-6.7
Lacks the quality to compete with better howitzer such as type 75 and type 99, the merkava chassis provides limited advantages.
the xm800 does get 25mm apfsds with 81mm pen
I have run out of likes but i agree 100%
Yappatron 3000 X-Series.
Ground realistic battles, VEAK 40. 7.7 > 7.3
At its current BR, the VEAK 40 has a combination of weak radar (poor elevation, lack of IFF, and lack of TWS due to no separate tracking radar/IRST), poor rate of fire, and slow shell velocity, which limit its effectiveness at downing aircraft.
ZSU-37-2 Yenisei, the only other SPAA that shares its BR of 7.7, has nearly double the rate of fire, (501 rpm vs. 300 rpm), higher shell velocity (1000 m/s vs. 850 m/s), higher explosive mass (56.98 g vs. 44 g), and higher ammo count (540 vs. 420).
Even with all these advantages, Yenisei is not a particularly remarkable SPAA, so it’s inappropriate for VEAK 40 to share its BR despite being significantly less effective.
Air Realistic, F-104G (China) 10,7 >10,3
Has no flares unlike other F-104Gs and has less AIM-9J missiles than F-104J has AIM-9Ps
In this AIM-9P equal near equal to an AIM-9J as AIM-9P has radar slaving while AIM-9J doesn’t
Spacing the worse top MBTs from the top ones around 11.3 is a good idea to me. Type 90, Leo 2A5/PL, Ariete PSO/C1, T-80Us, M1A1 etc
Try the other nations which have the Ah64, there are worse nations than isreal when it comes to the A
Tornado MFG, WTD61 and A200 are all 10.3 with 2x Aim-9ls and a flight performance that destroys the Jaguar IS. 2x Magic IIs really arent that good, especially as most aircraft at that BR have plenty of CMs. But making it 10.7 turns it from a totally useless paper-wieght, to an acutally viable aircraft to be added to the now 10.7 ground line-up.
Jai hind energy