Planned Battle Rating changes for August 2025 (updated 16:00, 15.08)

The F-16’s that are getting amraams should be 13.7-14.0 minimum, why let them bully planes that don’t have any FOX-3 missiles of their own?

6 Likes

GRB, Increase the Max BR from 12.0 → 13.0, planes can allready have an BR of 13.0 in GRB, so pls Use it, this will gave the area below some decompression, this way Leopard 2A7V could be 13.0, while 2A6 → 12.7 and Leopard 2A5 could be changed from 12.0 → 12.3 (as example)

36 Likes

Mode: Ground Realistic Battles
Vehicle: VT-5
BR Change with new round/reload: 11.0 → 11.3

Reasoning:
If the VT-5 had BTA2 APFSDS added and its reload was decreased to its possible 4 seconds, it would make sense, but now you have a light tank with worse mobility, reload and armour vs the Type 90 at the exact same br. Make it make sense

41 Likes

What did the Valentine I do to you?? It’s gun and mobility are terrible to be put higher!

Edit: the concept 3, SARC MkVI and AEC Mk II are also definitely not good enough to be thrown up as well.

38 Likes

Hello!

All the Merkava Mk.1/2s are 9.7, but now Merkava Mk.2D will sit at 10.3, 2 BRs higher, even though it’s virtually identical.

Is an improvement in protection coming, or something?

To date, the “composite screens” that differentiate it from the others provide no additional protection at all, so I’m having a difficult time finding an explanation as to why this tank deserves to sit alone 2 BR steps higher than the rest of its family members.

34 Likes

No IRCCM missiles, bad radar compared to the rest, low ammount of counter measures, no HMD. And all those 120 can be still multi pathed how so you want them to be 13.7

4 Likes

What kind of nonsense is this with the Tiger II’s power? It has the exact same engine, and in the game the total engine power is always used for all vehicles, not the net power.
Aren’t you tired of nerfing the Germans?

I read the report – it’s complete nonsense, on the level of “some factory once limited the RPM on some engine.” In the game, all vehicles are in perfect condition, with no power take-off or similar losses taken into account.

57 Likes

Cleart British stats are too good again :)

19 Likes

it seems it wont get access to HMD and TWS and AIM-9M so that’s a few reasons why it cant be 13.7.

2 Likes

Mode: Ground Realistic Battles

Vehicle: Su-17M4/Su-22M4
BR Change: 11.0 > 10.7

Reasoning:
If we take CAS planes at 10.7 such as AJS37, A-10A Late and A-6E as a prime examples of 10.7 CAS aricraft, then in comparison with them Su-17M4/22M4 is arguably on par and should be lowered in BR accordingly.

8 Likes

Looks like F-15E/I is missing from the list. They should go to 14.3 along with EFTs and Rafale.

Su-30SM is fine at 14.0. The air-frame is nowhere comparable to other 14.3 planes.

16 Likes

same for the Kölns

Gaijin BR changes are the highlights of my year, whenever I think I’m stupid I just have to look at these and I realise I’m fine

64 Likes

Ah I find Kolns too. But Ayanami was originally 4.0

Leopard 2A7V
Ground Realistic Battle
12.0–>12.3
fix its armor hole, addon ufp KE multiplier and give it its realistic D-tech armor, it is currently better than many 12.0 MBT, so it should be at least 0.3 br higher than 12.0 while also use this opportunity to fix its armor

25 Likes

Its going to 8.7 in ground battles though

lets pretend i never said that ;)

what is this joke?
Why is ARB increased in max BR again but GRB is still stuck at 12.0?!?!?!
We shouldve gotten 13.0 over a year ago!

9 Likes

Mode: Air Realistic Battles

Vehicle: Su-34
BR Change: 13.7 > 13.3

Reasoning:
If we take planes at 13.7 such as F-15C, F-15J(M), F-16C and Su-27SM as a prime examples of 13.7 aricraft, then in comparison with them Su-34 is arguably worse and shouldn’t be raised in BR. Since it’s a boat of plane, the definition of missile bus and bad one at that.

11 Likes

GRB, PzH 2000/ PzH 2000HU, 7.7 → 8.0
Reason: very good Mobility, Good Firerate, Laser rangefinder, it should not be able to fight against 6.7

79 Likes