Planned Battle Rating changes for August 2025 (updated 16:00, 15.08)

And then that one marketplace M60 that shoots KEW seems to have John Cena’s ability, no one ever see him there and everybody got moved up but it stays where he is lol that thing definitely better than the Sabra too, on top of quicker reverse and it has a 30mm secondary cannon to play with. Meanwhile USA mains still think gaijin hates them. Lmao

2 Likes

Gutting low tier like Valentine, Chi-Ha LG and the SARC for no real reason whatsoever, classic gaijin

2 Likes

It should, but so should the Turm III go up, it has no business being at 8.3

1 Like

All the Panthers that M-51 can oneshot from the front.

only to 14.3, and only for e2k and rfl?

This takes not work lmao. do 15.0

I think the 12.7 mig-29’s should either go down to 12.3 or get their r73’s

2 Likes

Aubl HVG: Rate of fire: 10 RPM → 15 RPM

This is a very needed change. The low post penetration damage of its shell combined with the relatively long reload rate means that you will often not be able to even kill a tank before they kill you, even if you get the first shot off.

5 Likes

Mode: Air Realistic Battles

Vehicle:Hunter F.6
BR Change: 9.7>9.3

Reasoning:
The missiles have been heavily nerfed, yet this plane remains at 9.7 as if nothing changed.
Without flares, it’s painfully difficult to survive in the current meta.
It offers no real advantages over the FGA.9 or other 9.3 Hunters.
Honestly, you’re more likely to spot a unicorn than encounter this plane in battle.

10 Likes

fair opinion to make tbf
however, the M-51 was pretty much a glass cannon.
At 6.0 the Sherman’s armour is paper, and it’s not very mobile either.
Not sure that it should move up to 6.3 but it’s performance shouldn’t be affected much, the M51 was all about the gun anyway

1 Like

from my point on the obj140 as ive just bought it recently it doesnt deserve the 8.7 br as already in a uptier it gets point and clicked but the Turm 3 should definitely go to 8.7 as it has more pen than a chieftan better mobility and a coax 30mm and would fit that be more

3 Likes

M-51 is one of these tanks that don’t really fit this game, similar case with arty tanks like PzH

2 Likes

Valentine is a bit questionable, yeah.
Chi-Ha LG will be still doing more than ok, it is a beast.
SARC got moved simply because of the 6 pounder and with recent buff to accuracy, it will be fine.

2 Likes

Wyvern to 5.7

2 Likes

Mode: GRB
Vehicle: FV4005
BR change: 6.3–>3.7
With the new buffs to the KV-2 (3.7) the FV4005 is argueably worse than it (less armour, less mobile, LONGER reload)
There is absolutely no reason the FV4005 should sit at 6.3, especially with HESH in it’s current state.
Yes, its a HUGE BR reduction, but there is simply nowhere to put it and I have compared it with a 3.7 howitzer…


we-have-no-sappers-dog-accepting-fate

12 Likes

Except Chi-Ha LG has no lineup on that br and is, simply put, a glass cannon that can be mg’d to death by anyone

1 Like

AEC Mk. II: Addition of Shot, APDS, Mk 1T

While this will not significantly affect the vehicle at its current br since the 6 pounder it is equipped can take out most tanks without having to aim, it will make it a lot more viable as a support tank at higher tiers

2 Likes

So if you gave the F-16 ADFs AIM-120s for historical reasons, don’t you think the F-14s should all get their appropriate heatseeking missiles now? F-14B is NEWER than the F-15A variant in game, yet it carries AIM-9L, meanwhile the F-15A gets AIM-9M which didn’t even exist for many years after entering service.

Applying that logic to the F-14A, it deserves the AIM-9L. Applying the same logic of the R-27R to the F-14A IRIAF as well, that aircraft deserves the R-73.

4 Likes

Yeah it makes no sense, or it should get it’s 4-3sec reload (i don’t remember what was the lowest)

Otomatic is miserable gaijin for the love of god, drop the br or i’m going to rest in pepperoni

2 Likes