Maybe you have some sources about this… Because of what i heard, t34s weren’t able to produce 500hp in NON-IDEAL conditions… ┐('～`;)┌
KV1 has the same engine as t34 and makes 600 HP but is governed at a different RPM I don’t know what you’re not understanding about this
3 Likes
Hmm, i was sure but not now… Maybe im just tripping
(ヽ´ω`)
Ok then, i see, but this still doesn’t make this chang-list reasonable for me with all this br bumps for solid part of tanks in list…
1 Like
I can’t really speak much on that but the tiger change is historical
Looks like you are right here… So we are getting ‘historical’ tiger after years, maybe we can get other vehicles ‘historical’ too… Maybe we can finally get an accurate armor for Ariet and Leclerc, or spoleliners for all vehicles whitch miss them… Nah, i’m dreaming too much, we will get another 11.7 premium tank and ‘historical’ nefrs for other vehicles ヽ( ´ー｀)ノ
1 Like
yep it only took gaijin 3 years to change it after it was bug reported
4 Likes
Yeah, there were some bug reports which are 2-3 year old now and was accepted long ago but nothing changed… For example bugreport about spoleliners for Leclerc…
3 Likes
Any historical change is a positive in my view provided proper sources of course
And yes gaijin does drag their feet when it comes to bug reports for a lot of stuff That’s why I feel like a lot of the things that they add is a waste of time rather than fixing models and mechanics that we already have
4 Likes
Agreed, but even a good sources mean nothind for Gaijing… The NATO sources for NATO tanks aren’t reliable for them, videos aren’t sources, they only accept ‘secret dokumants’ and this’s so frustrating for me…
I was actualy thinking about making some bug report from past again to remember Gaijing about them but we all know that this is just a waste of time and doesn’t worth our time cause these bugreports will be claimed tweaks and nothing will change…
2 Likes
From the datamine:
- J-8F:
- new loadout(s): 6x PL-5EII,
- custom loadout changes: slots 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 changed: added 1x PL-5EII option,
- added modifications: PL-5EII (tier II),
- modification changes:
- 23 mm belts, Compressor, Flares/Chaff, Fuselage repair, PL-5B: GE cost: 340 → 360,
- Airframe, G-suit, HF-6, New boosters:
- RP cost: 17000 → 14000,
- SL cost: 26000 → 22000,
- GE cost: 480 → 420,
- Cover, EFS, Engine, Type 500: GE cost: 710 → 750,
- New 23 mm cannons/MGs, Type 250, Wings repair: GE cost: 540 → 570,
- PL-8:
- modification requirement: PL-5B → PL-5EII,
- GE cost: 540 → 570
How the hell they can give J-8F IRCCM Missile, and yet not to the F-14B wtf
5 Likes
It’s interesting that the TURM III remains at 8.3, while the AMX-30B2 and BRENUS stay at 8.7 despite lacking an autoloader or stabilizer.
12 Likes
That abomination also has a coax 30mm aphe autocannon and far better gun depression
1 Like
When are you guys gonna update the table damn
An actually usable coax?
France could never since fuck 20mm HVAP I guess
6 Likes
even solid AP will be an improvement
2 Likes
The 20mm can fire apds or even apfsds, but Gaijin being Gaijin, adding something like that might brake the game, maybe…
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/VvHhjWeofCQS
AMX-30B2 BRENUS improvements (other bugs)
5 Likes
Yeah especially when the leclerc or ACRA .50cal coax is more eefective.
That’s coz turm is a premium and AMXs are not… Didn’t you think about that??? That’s Gaijing…
Indeed.
Tbh I don’t care if it fires crayons or pencils or whatever. I just want to be able to kill BMPs from the sides.
4 Likes
Can we do something like this with ariete and leclerc and other vehicles that need it or is it just a waste of time, energy and nerves? (*^ω^)