Mode: NAB
Vehicle: HMS Southampton
BR Change: 6.0 → 5.7
Reason:It has the same 6-inch guns and similar armor and torpedoes compared to HMS Liverpool, with one extra turret. A 6 inch light cruiser at 6.0 is simply not viable in any regard when facing battle-cruisers and battleships.
i agree ,Bmd4 is certainly an OP thing, while the 57 had only ap and trash misslle with only 630pen
HMS Tiger - 6.0. Its a bit to much when you see her accuracy !
Increase accuracy
Richelieu and Roma - 8.3
Increase accuracy to be like every other BBs.
Those are the worst BB of the game !
6 Likes
Unmanned turret, when hull down its near impposible to kill lol I’d say give it a better shell if they are moving it up, there is nothing between M900 and M833?
1 Like
Mode: AIR RB
- Rafale C
BR 14.3 → 14.7
- Reasoning:
This aircraft has flight performance like no others and should have nothing to do with anything below it, it turbo stomps everything and is fairly matched only by the Eurofighter.
7 Likes
thanks chatgpt
2 Likes
VBC (PT-2) to 9.7 while BMD-4/4M stay at 9.3?
I can’t even…
9 Likes
Tbf, with stuff in mind an bug report would be realy fast done
1 Like
The movility nerfs for Germany are insane. Is not enough with nerf the movility of Panthers, Leopards and keep behind a brutal pay wall all good movility tanks for Germany. Now is the turn of the poor Tiger 2.
Jagdtiger with trash stats since years ago is nerfed again, excuse me what??? and the completely broken Yak 9 still unnerfed “cuz reasons”.
9 Likes
Counter point, those extra ready to use missiles are often all used up in an effort to get a kill. Where as a Roland is more likely to confirm a kill over it due to warhead differences. For every 1 missile a Roland needs to confirm a kill, a Rapier will at times need 3 or 4 against the same maneuvering target.
This is issue is more present with drones though, as it is very much a coin-flip every time you fire on one. (Do I kill it in one go? Or do I waste all 8 missiles trying to?)
Anecdotally though these missiles also present an exposed ammo rack for machine guns, it doesn’t happen all that often but it has happened.
2 Likes
arb
mig 29 smt
keep br at 13.3
add the r77-1
This vehicle is so sad, not only it struggle to maintain speed. meaning the already slow r77 will not go as far. it has such a horrid flight model is mental. gets outclassed by any plane. The R77-1 would increase the range of the MiG-29 smt lethality and would make it alot better in bvr and saving it in close engagements as the r77-1 would power through turns more.
6 Likes
Completely agree.
The sea hawk already gets flattened in an up tier. It seeing supersonics creates a situation where it could do literally nothing.
If anything, I would like to see the Tech Tree variety go down in BR
2 Likes
Mode: Ground Realistic
Vehicle: Sidam
BR Change: 8.3 → 8.0
Reasoning: Compared to other platforms at the same br the SIDAM is clearly disadvantaged in terms of mobility, protection, AA ammunition range, and the fact that for anti-tank purposes it only has 40 APDS, while the Gepard and other platforms have access to the DM13. It also lacks a radar. It borders on the ridiculous considering that it has the same BR as the British or American anti-aircraft vehicles at that BR, not just when compared to the Gepard.
9 Likes
PremiumVehicle seems to have a BR increase barrier function. Cheers!
2 Likes
It could receive M900 and then go up to 12.0.
That thing looks like an upgraded 2A4.
By the way, 2A4 needs Ace crew to reload every 6s.
Vehicle: T95E1
Mode: Ground realistic
Proposed change: 8.3 → 8.0
Reasoning:
T95E1 always felt like odd one out when compared to US 8.3/8.7 lineup.
While I firmly believe that just because vehicle can see uptiers doesnt make it bad, in this case im going to say T95E1 has NO business seeing T-72s in a uptier.
Its kit is mid at best and the lack of stabilizer condems this vehicle to completly passive playstyle.
Fact that AOS sits at the same BR and mere 0.4 BR higher there is RISE (P) which does everything T95E1 does but better doesnt help its situation.
Its one of those vehicles I spaded and immidiately threw away because the experience was just so god damn awful.
At 8.0 it could at least form lineup with M60 and have some use there.
6 Likes
Is the weight of the VT5 and Type 90 the same? What does the Vt5 rely on to counter the Type 90? Should he rely on his reconnaissance drone to crash into it or on his thermal imaging? Wouldn’t you be willing to stick your entire family’s ashes on the VT5 to increase its armor-piercing resistance by 0.5?
5 Likes
Object 140
(RB) 8.3-8.7 → NO CHANGE
The Object 140 functions well as a sidegrade to the T-55, lacking APFSDS but in turn gaining a better AP shell. To move it to 8.7, where it is far less equipped to deal with enemies than TURM III at 8.3, is nonsensical, as it is a tank that lacks the technology to deal with any uptier to 9.7.
26 Likes
AMX-32
BR:9.3->9.3
The AMX-32 itself current is not superior to any of the same BR MBT, especially when considering it as a mobile-long range sniper MBT.
The leopard 1a5 and OF-40 MTCA is both superior in firepower, using DM33s with 421 pen at 0m vs AMX-32 at 395 at 0m. The reload is the same as well.
At the same time, gaijin you specifically destroyed any sense of good gun handling by fixing a 10X scope in addition to small FOV and black edges around the gunner view, making it damn near impossible to engage at close range without missing the target due to terrible gun-raising issues of 3rd person, or overwhelm with debris and terrain.
The only “outstanding” point is a 20mm coaxial cannon, which fires a mix of HE and HVAP (terrible shattering) that is only effective against tracking, occasionally super light armor (which is already being penned by 12.7mm MG) and occasion barrel breaking.
The mobility itself is only “good” on paper. Gaijin yourself specifically gutted the transmission and track-resistant on it and made acceleration absolutely terrible and no where near reflecting its 20hp P/W, reflecting worse sluggishness compare to leopard 1a5 and not to mention OF-40 or MBT-70s.
There is no outstanding armour as well. It gets penetrated and one shot by same BR darts just as easily as any other same BR sniper MBT, being worse than KPZ70 or XM803.
In fact, both AMX-32 requires a buff in mobility and gunner sight configuration.
79 Likes
GRB,
BO 105 PAH-1
9.3 > 9.0.
Reasoning:
It is nearly an Copy of the other BO, but has worse missiles, lowering it to 9.0 would also allow it to be used in the 9.0 lineup, hopefully this way this BO would be played more as currently there is not an single reason to play it over the other BO 105
10 Likes