r-73s would be more real on that tomacat than the r-27 tho
didnt Iran manage to integrate the r-73 on their Phantoms?
1 Like
All I could find was a deleted youtube video, link doesn’t work anymore. Whether it actually had it or not in the video I’m not even sure. Not something I’m super interested in though, I’ll take my loss
Technically no, because that missile was at least tested and proven to be. Although it was incompatible, it’s a much more real addition than the R-73 on it which would be completely fictional. It can’t even use the proper rails for it.
Yes, they also integrated it onto their F-5s. They’re not F-14s though.
my point is that the interface of the F-4 and F-5 is probably pretty similar to the one in the F-14
so if they managed to do it on the F-4, they could have done it for the F-14 as well
there was probably some other reason to why it didnt happen in the end
but it is just speculation
1 Like
Type 90 and TKX get better apfds?
What about old planes? They often isn’t playable now… More of them have wrong statistic of flight. For example: FJ-4B have 39m/s climb not 35m…
mbt on higher br isn’t good too, good gun with terrible handling…
What about errors like Sho’t Kal Dalet have 76mm of upper armor… (Gimmel have 130mm). Why slow Israel paper centurions are on 8.7 - 9.0…
1 Like
And it also has no smoke against CAS.
1 Like
The reason why Im guessing they are 13.3, is that ontop of a weaker radar, less CMs and no HMD. They dont get Aim-9Ms/Aim-9Li. Meaning no IRCCM.
2 Likes
Good:
Finally, Ayit gets uptiered. I have more than 1000 vehicles and that one might be the most OP thing I played.
Bad:
14.0 to 14.3? That’s too little decompression.
Most of the ground BR changes are complete nonsense.
3 Likes
This document: https://invenio.bundesarchiv.de/invenio/direktlink/735639fb-9668-4528-bf49-24de47a5dfc1/ states in attachment A (starting page 32) that the Tiger E has 700 HP at 3000 RPM and the Tiger B (Tiger 2) has 750 HP at 3000 RPM (dated 09.02.44 and 18.09.44), therefor the engine power of the tigers should at least stay the same
2 Likes
Bug report it when the patch releases. The only way unfortunately.
In your other thread, you mentioned the Tiger II (H) sla 16. However, it does not have the Maybach petrol engine that they want to nerf here, but a diesel engine. So there is no danger for you, just a completely nonsensical and unnecessary action that is directed against all users of the Maybach HL 230.
Basically, this would then also affect all Panthers, the Tiger H1, the Jagdpanther, the Jagdtiger, the Sturmtiger and even the ARL 44, because they all used the same engine…
Nope, not while Britain has it
I mean of course, your using as reference the F-15J(M), an F-15C counterpart, not the F-15E. However, even if you were using the F-15E as comparison, your anecdotal experience is not under any circumstance valid for a raw performance comparison, given that skill and playstyle is involved aswell.
R-77-1s are not better than AIM-120 at anything other than straight line range. It loses energy way faster upon maneouvering and is more draggy. in general the AIM-120 it is a better missile for mid range fights just by the sheer speed bleed of the 77-1.
So, while 30SM has more missiles, it should be easier to score hits with the F-15E by mantaining speed and altitude to lob them at the fire ball. And thus, both fighters are comparable, and with them, their BRs.
likely yes, even tough the information is newer than the dirver manual used for the nerf (driver manual is from 01.09.44 while this document has tiger b parts from 18.09.44)
1 Like
lol, lmao even. Get a grip. They’re better at any realistic distance than the 120.
The only realistic scenario the AIM-120 series is better is over 25kms, and even then, it’s absurd to overextend BVR engagements to that extent.
AIM-120s pull less Gs, have less AOA fin performance, less motor energy, and also, less drag. While the R-77-1 pulls better, is capable to do sharp turns with its AOA fin performance, and have a decent motor which puts it beyond most if not all missiles in energy performance by a hilarious rate.
That at the cost of the infamous drag argument all russian mains seem to cope eternally in an effort to gaslight gaijin into thinking a diametrically huge piece of metal with grilled fins will kinetically perform similar if not even better than a sharply designed missile.
My bad, i misread the graph. i might edit my comment later.
“Get a grip” “Theyre better at this scenario because, uh, yes” such an exquisite answer.
to bad the tiger 2 is limited to 2500RPM
(document is from september 1944)
1 Like
Read again, just in case you need an actual lecture beyond your ru main glasses.
this document is from 01.09.44 while the technical specifications i shared were from 18.09.44, so the technical specifications were made after the driver manual AND state it has more HP
1 Like