Is the Eurofighter and company not faster, more maneuverable, able to super cruise better (or at all), pull harder, and doesn’t the Rafale have an AESA radar? I dont have any of them but the F-15E and Rafale so this is from a genuine curiosity. My understanding is that the F-15E is more simply a missile bus. It throws missiles and then runs. Whereas the EF and Co are more thoroughbred dogfighters. Which to me, makes sense they would go up because they get the same missiles as the F-15E while also being far more maneuverable.
I have no foot in your lil debate going on, but just want to say that the Ayit will still be great at 9.7. Love that thing.
Yeah, I hope they implement these asap. It’s clear the discussions in this topic are leading to nothing. They’ve made their mind up.
Thats a historical change and this is the wrong place to post that here, please find an appropriate thread.
it was anounced in this post, therefore it is the right place, this is the appropiate thread
No, your post lacks any relevance to BR, rather your post is asking for a a-historical change which invalidates any credibility you have, i suggest posting documents if you believe otherwise Gaijin.net // Issues
This would be the correct place to post any information if you believe gaijin has it wrong.
I know lol.
It’s gonna be on par or superior to the harriers still, which I’d call the benchmark 9.7
The guy I was having the debate with was wanting the dutch hunter moved back to 9.0, of which it dominated not too long ago.
1 Like
Will easily outperform a few aircraft already at 9.7
1 Like
I was thinking more the Hunters. A well played Harrier would probably still win against an A-4 and most also have CMs, but something like the Hunter F6 has weaker missiles, no CMs and not even necessarily a better dogfighting performance
ahistorical like the f5cs flares and missiles? or ahistorical like us f5E weapons/flares (exept 9E) or the working ahistorical r27 on the f14 or the ahistorical boats, or the ahistorical tanks, or the ahistorical whatever you can really go forever with this
I personally don’t think the F.6 or GR.1 should sit at 9.7
I was comparing the ayit with the GR.3 or AV8A/Cs fitted with the 9Gs and countermeasures.
the F.6 is pretty much a straight downgrade from the Ayit.
SRAAM fixes aren’t looking likely as it only affects britain and the bugreports are getting very old…
The HF-24 should go down in br. At 9.0 it is quite outclassed and they are never seen in game now only a few months after the event.
Again use the correct site to adress the concern if its wrong, this isn’t the area for that.
Side note yes id be fine with a historical F-5C but that wasn’t the topic vehicle, it was the NF-5A. Again if you believe its wrong please use the correct forums
how so, its quite a solid plane at 9.0
F-2A: Give it 4x AAM-4B and then move it up in BR (Air RB)
Yeah. I agree.
TBH I have been finding it pretty solid at 9.0 for air RB (been using it to grind the F106 event)
GRB however I would agree, it should likely drop because it has no MCLOS, no AAM, no RWR, no flares, no CCIP, no CCRP.
Its a dumb bomb bomber and it fights SAM systems, 8.7 or even 8.3 would be more suitable.
It should lose airspawn. Its crazy it gets airspawn but something totally and completely unarmed like the Buc S1 doesnt.
1 Like
Bucc S1 should prob be moved to rank V honestly lol. Not the Marut being hit instead.
2 Likes