AMX-40 10.0 (Update) > 9.7. The tank is similar to the Leopard 2K, but is a tier worse, does not have a knockout panel, lower mobility, APFSDS, armor is a tier worse. And most importantly, they will break the sets and France will have one useless tank which is not much different from АМХ-32 (120).
4 Likes
hori production can go down to 7.0, but not because it cant pen a jagdtiger or cant tank its shells, but because the new nerf that makes hori’s top open even when looking down. before it was only a visual change, now it affects the damage model too.
now every heat/hesh/he over pressures every crew member from the rear compartament, if you happen to have your gun pointing downwards at all.
1 Like
That would be a solid point for ho-ri production to have same br not almost br higher (imo engine power isnt that big of a deal give it has same role as jagtiger but is worse at it since reload barely matters if you cant pen things at your br or face things that goes thru ho-ri armour like butter). While ho-ri prototype does not even have that engine power. Do you have any point to justify ho-ri prototype being at same br as jagtiger?
1 Like
They both have the same mobility (26hp/ton on both), similarly performing apfsds angled performance wise, amx40 has thermals and protection against HEAT better at the upper front plate. they should be the same BR.
what should also be the same BR is the T64BV, it’s got a better round than both, and better protection and armor, and even better with the ERA. the only thing it lacks is the mobility which it makes up for by being harder hitting, faster reloading and better protected. The Amx40 deserves the uptier. it should be the same tier as the leo2k and the Shir2, but also the T64BV.
Brenus does stop them , the era doesnt but the armour especially on the turret does.
If we’re moving stuff like t55amd1 and such up brenus should go up to.
As well as most 8.7s, to eleviate the 7.7 area.
The lack of a stab doesn’t make the brenus obsolete like folks claim, the lack of a stab just means you have to play a bit smarter.
The fact is it has.
- thermals
- laser range finder
- 9.3 dart
- good mobility
- has IRCM as well (soft kill aps)
- has the era as well.
3 Likes
TRB F111C 11.7->11.3/11.0 the developer gave this combat rating absolutely inadequately, the plane with only 4 guided bombs fights against all top SAMs. Is this some kind of joke? Give this plane an AGM-65 and then we can leave it alone. Otherwise, it’s cringe and a complete lack of developer competence.
Yes but in a 7.7 match how many tanks have a stab?
It has literally everything bar a stab, if stuff like t55am is movijg up then it should do realistically
1 Like
Lol you got proven to be wrong.
Im.no russian main, i dont main anything at all.
2 Likes
Disagree with me = Russia main
5 Likes
you’re ignoring the elephant in the room which is 4 paveway3s and a targeting pod and the speed and acceleration. at 11.0 it’ll just crap on everything else
I think it is high time to give the F14s better IR missiles.
Considering that the F-15A, the MiG-29G, F-18A and C (Early), F16 ADFs, Mirage 2K, 4K and what not get all aspect missiles, the F14As should get the AIM-9L and te F14B should get the AIM-9M. Either that or lower the BRs.
I think that the F14A itself should NOT be higher than the F18 and F16, it makes no sense. It has a worse radar, worse airframe and worse defenses since its engines burn very hot. Abysmal engine power and lack luster IR missiles add to that. Either give it its 9Ls or move it down.
The F14B is just outclassed by everything since its radar is once again very bad since it lacks HMD and a general PD mode,whilst it doesnt get any IRCCM missiles.
Sure both have Fox-3s, but it really isn’t a challenge to dodge an AIM-54, and in that BR bracket players should be expected to know how to not fly directly towards one. I mean the phoenixes literally have a smoke trail screaming “look, i am here, exactly here, literally showing you where i am right now and where i am going”.
I understand that, but you’ll always be able to see 8.3s en masse. Against 7.7 it’s pretty strong, yeah.
If u like russia so much and u trying so hard to keep it op
Then yes
I’ve played most nations in the game and can’t see how they are OP.
1 Like
The irony is that noamax is probably the biggest nation main in this discussion.
1 Like
Not even sort of relevant, it has very good APFSDS which is far better than any of those
Just because a tank isn’t amazing at a certain playstyle doesn’t mean it’s not dominant.
According to StatShark neither you nor @MotorolaCRO have played it, @An_Pigeon and I have and we agree it’s incredibly strong.
So is moving up the T-55s which was the entire point of our discussion.
1 Like
Vehicle: T64BV
BR: 9.7 —> 10.0
Seeing the Shir2 and the AMX40 rightfully go up in BR to 10.0, it’s only fair if the T64BV moves up as well.
It’s got better armor stock than the leo2k and the amx40, and even better with the ERA package. it can eat their apfsds rounds reliably if somewhat angled. It’s got a greater apfsds than the 10.0 tanks mentioned, and a better reload than the leo2k and amx40 (without the aced crew). what it lacks for is the mobility which makes it use a different playstyle, giving it a more relaxed playstyle of sniping and eating rounds.
4 Likes
If AM-1 moved up to 9.0 then most other 8.7s should as well. I was just telling you that stabilization is a bit more important than you might think.
No. Its fine where it is.
Yeah but with the BRENUS it’s a bit different, but I think you need to play it to understand what I mean about the stabilizer.
1 Like