Planned Battle Rating changes for April 2025

Lets not nerf any form of anti CAS maybe? Just lower the Type 81 to 11.0/10.7

2 Likes

Crucially, it’s not that no one plays it, and thus no one cares about it, but likely that only people who like it play it, meaning only people who are good with it are playing it and skewing the statistics.

Chieftain MK3( Britain )
8.7–> 8.3
Extremely weak mobility, awkward armour, lacks a laser rangefinder, quite a long reload for the BR and the round (L15A5) is at best, average.

Leopard 2A7HU
Ground Realistic Battle
12.0–>12.3
fix its armor hole and give it its realistic D-tech armor, it is currently better than many 12.0 MBT, so it should be at least 0.3 br higher than 12.0 while also use this opportunity to fix its armor

3 Likes

What?

I would agree, for all others, but the 2S6 is rather insane performance for 10.7. Given the closest in performance I can think of are all at 11.3/11.7

It goes up while VT1-2 still is underBRed lol

Lol, rip 8.7 no more linups before 10.0 i guess

1 Like

No it’s not, try using it on anything that moves past 5km and you’ll see.

Still no tank and plane decompression, only grb plane?

1 Like

Yep

If something has incorrect armaments, then it can be reported as a suggestion for consideration.

1 Like

Overall Feedback:
Honestly, most of the BR changes here look really good!

One Suggestion I’d Like to Add:

  • Mode: Ground RB
  • Vehicles: KV-1E (USSR) & KV-1B (Germany)

The Problem:
These two tanks are extremely strong for their BR. They feature exceptionally good armor—arguably better than the Tiger I in some aspects—and a solid gun. At 4.0, they face many 3.3 and 3.0 vehicles that simply can’t compete. Most of those lower-BR vehicles struggle to penetrate them, often only having one small weak spot to aim for. Even vehicles at 4.0 have a tough time dealing with them.

Suggested Change:
Increase the BR of both the KV-1E and KV-1B to at least 4.3, matching their current BR in Arcade Battles. This would align them with other similar vehicles like the KV-7 and KV-1S, which are also being moved to 4.3 and rightly so.

4 Likes

Please consider reducing the BR of the Chieftain Mk.3. It’s way too slow and lacks a laser rangefinder and a good round to compensate, compared to the olifant mk1, which has an LRF and an APFSDS to make up for it being slow. and please consider adding an lrf to the chieftain mk5, as it had one irl.

3 Likes

100% needed

Gaijin has had almost two years to do that and hasn’t. It’s time for it to go. You can’t even get community managers to acknowledge it.

I’ve already put something on the chieftain mk3, its just not up to 8.7 standards.

It is reported, but those reports get ignored

Tiger HAC should not be able to use rocket pods
Tiger HAC should not have ATAS
Tiger HAC should not have HOT 3

While The Tiger UHT, has Reports from YEARS ago, fir Missing Outer pylon rockets, outer Pylon PARS, missing Mistral AAMs, all the atuff which the HAC got from day 1 (On live) while the UHT still waits that one day an dev has mercy and finally kills it :(

1 Like

I’d like to suggest ammunition changes for the following vehicles, with battle rating changes if need be.

XM1 - M774 (or XM774)

M60A3 TTS - M833

Vextra 105 - OFL 105 F2 (This one would most likely need a battle rating increase)

5 Likes

Mode: Air Realistic Battles

Aircraft: Q-5A

Change: 10.0 → 9.7

Reasoning: Its 23mm guns are hard to use and compensate with bigger lead, and it’s not as fantastic as German and Soviet counterparts, which are still placed at 9.3. I highly believe it should remain unchanged at the BR of 9.7

5 Likes