Planned Battle Rating changes for April 2025

Since Vextra was kept at 9.7 but given a worse shell to accompany the AMX-40 in a line-up, give it a better shell and move it up to 10.0 to keep it company there.

7 Likes

I mean its the same reason why the MiG-21SMT/MF is at 10.3 now. Even though they should be 10.7 bc they where perfectly fine at 10.7. Players dont know how to use such a strong kit and fail the result is that it will get a lower br. with the SMT and MF i have like 200 deaths - 900 Kills. Its insane how that plane at 10.3 is. same for J35XS should also be 10.7 again.

And like you said the J-7D was good at 11.0 i understand that they have it at 10.7 with that shit engine that overheats so fast but 11.0 would be fine for it.

i mean the J-7E is carried by the PL-5Bs at 11.3 otherwise it would be 10.7 or 11.0 so the J-7D is fine where it is.

Also i bought a Talisman for the J-7E bc it is so good.

3 Likes

8.7 Shot is a prime target to move up to 9.0, especially with some contemporaries doing the same.

2 Likes

I swear this community is hopeless. My comments about France getting punished and a similar one from someone else got more upvotes than any BR change suggestion.

GO UPVOTE THE SUGGESTIONS, PEOPLE.

2 Likes

Nope I am meaning german 665 UHT like i wrote and reasons why it should stay in 12.0 since french is better version of it.
And besides mistrals are way better compared on stingers on german version

Yeah literally 100% of f3h-2 I’ve ran into will just turn no matter what lose all their speed and then die cause of that. Probably why it was moved down in the first place. As far as I understand it it turns ok at top speed, has good/great acceleration for 9.0 and can carry 4 missiles. And the first aim9 isnt useless, especially having 4 of them is helpful. Even if its not a monster shouldn’t have moved down in the first place.

The 2a7 should be a higher BR.

The M1A2 is comparable to the 2a5

Which shock horror is 12.0

1 Like

The T55AMD1 and AM1 are going to 9.0

The TTS had the same round as rhe 10.7 m1 abrams.
Has great optics.

Has thermal imaging.

Has a more survivable layout than the T55s as well.
The tanks armours are about equal bar the era or the horrible composites.

The T55A goijg to 8.7 is prettt ridiculous as is but its.not as bad as the others going to 9.0.

How are they equal to the likes of the ztz88A/B
The magachs.
Shot kals
Stv104.

The mobility once spaded isnt much different than a T55?

2 Likes

Too many folks on tbese topics dont wsnt actual balance though

4 Likes

Doesn’t deserve any higher than 10.3.

A beast at CQC, will get gulf war’d anywhere else.

In fact, 9.x tanks has faster target acquire speed and first shot advantage. Not saying this T-80 should be 9.X, but just giving context.

which is more a thing of how horrible the Abrams is pen wise at 10.7 than how good the TTS is pen wise at 9.0.

The t80UD is an 11.7 tank with mango rounds and a t72 enginr.

It stil has fantastic optics sin the thermals.

Good turret traverse, decent mobility as well.

Why you say its just for cqc is wild af, its a side grade to the 80B

1 Like

Tbh while i do believe the M1 should get a better round, the m774 is still good enough for the BR, got over 215 angle pen on a 5 second reload and a monster fast platform.

Just got the m1kvt to bolster my 10.7 lineup n im near.in a 2.0 kd with it

It appears that way because grinding to top tier in another tank tree takes extreme amount of time.

If you’re exposed to only one side of the vehicle (fighting/fighting in), it’s hard to make a proper argument.

What ? Ive got over half the trees in game at top tier or 11.7 man, ive over 3000 hours on the game over nearly 6 years.

I want the game objectively balanced. So people have to use their brains a little.

For example not roll around in a type90 farming 10.3s

Or stomping abiut in a t80UD in 9.3 matches.

Oh shock the m1a1 clickbait, hc and m1a2 are stupidely good as well yet somehow sit lower than the arietes at 12.0 or the leopard 2a5 and subsequently a6.

Or how china has the ztz99s at 11.0 and they absolutely wreck house?

People on these topics just cry that their specific fav tank or plane should move down.

2 Likes

if grinding to top tier in trees didn’t take that much time, you would see much more balanced feedback, is what I’m saying.

How would you know if T-80BVM is really that OP or over hyped, if you dont have it, and getting to the particular tank takes months if not years of extreme grinding? Let’s say, maybe 10k RP a day, few rounds…you can see how long it takes.

Now imagine this of someone without premium vehicles and account.

Then id suggest getting better.
I made what, 100k rp yesterday in about 7 games.

What does the grind havw to do with people demanding their tank specifically id OP?
Especially a premium tank… which by all intemts and purposes should be worse than a TT counterpart.

It doesnt take that much time though.
Ive got i think 5 or 6 nations for ground top tier and 5 for air.

Its.not some big deal realistically, struggling with the grinds no excuse for stuff to be unbalanced.

Btw if it was balanced then the grind would be easier

1 Like

the average player gets 0.8 kills per spawn according to statshark. No data on how many times they spawn, but I guess it is within 1000-4000 RP range

Premium tanks still fight other vehicles (tech tree/prem) that are not owned by the suggesting player, so people can still make suggestions without being on both side of shooting/being shot at.

m60AMBT
10.0 to 10.3 GRB
It outperforms the Sabra in every aspect: autocannon, mobility, and auxiliary equipment. Gaijin, you can’t just ignore the AMBT because it makes players spend more Silver Lions on crates and allows you to rake in massive transaction fees from the exchange.

4 Likes

And think the strv 103 c is going at 9.0 for no reason

1 Like