if u compare Type90(11.3) with M1A1 Click-Bait(11.7) in detail:
Mobility: similar in their tier, both excellect
Protection: similar in their tier, both average even below average (after gaijin “fix” Type90)
Firepower: 4s jm33 versus 5s m829a2
Gunning Optics: both having first-gen thermal but Type90 has a much worse optics zoom
Turret Rotation Speed: 30 °/s versus 40°/s
Vertical guidance: -7 / 10° versus -10 / 20°, yes Type90 can use controlled suspension to compensate vertical guidance but that also make its transmission having a glue feeling
MISC Device: Type90 having LWS versus Click-Bait having APS but barely usable
So Click-Bait has better optics, turret rotation speed, questionable better vertical guidance and superb APFSDS
Type90 has 1 second faster reloading speed and LWS
If raise Type90 to 11.7, Type90 should get a better APFSDS, not necessary Type10 level, maybe 570-550 pen level
Fun fact acording to statshark witch you are using.
ITPSV has 1.03 KD
marksman hs 1.00 KD
Yes ITPSV has more ground kills per death, but that could be explained by more people experienced players playing Sweden (who are not using it in its inteded AA role)
If we are talking about anti tank performance this vehicle is quite balanced in 8.7, but against air targets it should be 8.3 so pick your poison.
You replied on the wrong post This one is about AMX-30 DCA
Talking about pure performance this AA is way worse than others, but if you look at player stats, this vehicle overperfroms since more experienced players seem to play france.
If you are talking about the Marksman AA:s the ITPSV is better, but when comparing player stats (from statshark) ITPSV only has a better KD of 0.03.
The hull only makes a minor difference in the end and the reason why it is opressive is because it is more often in more experienced hands of players or players who are used to dying easier since sweden is more light oriented, so they play more flanky/carefully
Yea, i think Chief has less ground kils due to the fact it has atrocious mobility + it’s loud as heck, making its ability to flank and sneak around much worse.
Vehicle: BI
BR: 6.7 → 7.0 or 7.3
Reason: BI’s performance can single-handedly destroy matches, with its main deciding factor on whether or not you can win against one is by the BI’s competence.
Click bait should be 12.0 and the type 90 should goto 11.7 with the TKX (P) all theyre doing here is making it uselss to use the TKX(P) as you wont be able to get the 10.3 downtiers u do with the type90s
Thats what I mean, they actively are recompressing it back, so compare it this way,
T55AM1 to 9.0
the M60A3 TTS is 9.0 with a better round, thermals, and more effective armour in the ERA.
or the fact shir 2 is moving up but isnt getting a round to compensate for it. It should be 10.0 but it should get a round like L23A1 to make it on par with the tanks around it.
In the leopard 2k, sabra and AMX40.
The TKX(p) moving up does nothing but stop people using it, as the lineup runs with the TKX(P) and two type 90s, now folks will remove the TKX to keep getting 10.3 downtiers.
These BR changes are shambolic man lets be honest.
M1A2 still 11.7, M1A1 HC still 11.7, when they are 12.0 equivelant tanks now
So u are saying raising type90 to 11.7 and using jm33 to fight again bvm, 90m, a7v, 122 etc more frequently is reasonable? Solid no unless gaijin raise top tier bar to 12.3/12.7
1:30secs of fuel that can be extended just by throttling down?
45 rounds when its just basic ammo management (something already learned when you play deep in the game.)