Yes, but why turn an extremely small chance into a guaranteed 0% of something being done?
1 Like
Vehicle: Seafire LF Mk. III (GB)/(FR)
Game mode: Air Arcade/Air Realistic/Air Simulator
BR change: 5.0 → 4.3 (AAB, ARB)/ 5.0 → 4.7 (ASB)
Reason: It’s just a sidegrade to the Spitfire F. Mk IX, as it gets a bit lighter airframe with a bit less powerful engine compared to Mk. IX. It’s not a excuse for a much higher BR.
2 Likes
For starters, T-54 is one of the worst 8.0s and should arguably move down to 7.7. Also, that APFSDS isn’t decent as it’s just a reskin of the APDS round and is probably the worst dart in the game.
The game is heavily compressed around this area so pushing something up/down even a single BR step can have big consequences.
For this to be fixed you need BR decompression and moving only T-55A up would achieve nothing.
4 Likes
sad day for xp-50 players but well deserved
1 Like
No if gaijin not giving better shell to Type90
if u compare Type90(11.3) with M1A1 Click-Bait(11.7) in detail:
- Mobility: similar in their tier, both excellect
- Protection: similar in their tier, both average even below average (after gaijin “fix” Type90)
- Firepower: 4s jm33 versus 5s m829a2
- Gunning Optics: both having first-gen thermal but Type90 has a much worse optics zoom
- Turret Rotation Speed: 30 °/s versus 40°/s
- Vertical guidance: -7 / 10° versus -10 / 20°, yes Type90 can use controlled suspension to compensate vertical guidance but that also make its transmission having a glue feeling
- MISC Device: Type90 having LWS versus Click-Bait having APS but barely usable
So Click-Bait has better optics, turret rotation speed, questionable better vertical guidance and superb APFSDS
Type90 has 1 second faster reloading speed and LWS
If raise Type90 to 11.7, Type90 should get a better APFSDS, not necessary Type10 level, maybe 570-550 pen level
1 Like
Clickbait has a ~6.5s reload unless you paid enough to get 5s
OK, let’s rule out ace level (5s), but I think expert level (5.3s) can be achieved by any player but new
Fun fact acording to statshark witch you are using.
ITPSV has 1.03 KD
marksman hs 1.00 KD
Yes ITPSV has more ground kills per death, but that could be explained by more people experienced players playing Sweden (who are not using it in its inteded AA role)
If we are talking about anti tank performance this vehicle is quite balanced in 8.7, but against air targets it should be 8.3 so pick your poison.
You replied on the wrong post This one is about AMX-30 DCA
Talking about pure performance this AA is way worse than others, but if you look at player stats, this vehicle overperfroms since more experienced players seem to play france.
If you are talking about the Marksman AA:s the ITPSV is better, but when comparing player stats (from statshark) ITPSV only has a better KD of 0.03.
The hull only makes a minor difference in the end and the reason why it is opressive is because it is more often in more experienced hands of players or players who are used to dying easier since sweden is more light oriented, so they play more flanky/carefully
1 Like
Yea, i think Chief has less ground kils due to the fact it has atrocious mobility + it’s loud as heck, making its ability to flank and sneak around much worse.
3 Likes
Air Realistic Battles
Vehicle: BI
BR: 6.7 → 7.0 or 7.3
Reason: BI’s performance can single-handedly destroy matches, with its main deciding factor on whether or not you can win against one is by the BI’s competence.
4 Likes
This has to be a joke?
So will the Shir 2 be getting L23A1 to compensate for being 10.0?
The L23 round is absolutely anemic in uptiers never mind facing off against 11.0 tanks like T90s, ZTZ99s and so on.
Also why is the TKX (P) going to 11.7 but not the type 90s?
Why is the leopard 2K the same Br as the amx 40, shir 2 and so on.
@MotorolaCRO what you reckon here? xD
T55’s going up as well.
YET no decompression of higher BRs? so were recompressing all these tanks into the 9.3 area again and upwards.
1 Like
Click bait should be 12.0 and the type 90 should goto 11.7 with the TKX (P) all theyre doing here is making it uselss to use the TKX(P) as you wont be able to get the 10.3 downtiers u do with the type90s
1 Like
Amx40 to 10.0 is cracked when theres already no lineup for it as is, now it will be a dead tank and will forever be compressed.
Theres no point dragging the amx32, 32 (105) and super up to see 11.0 with the amx40.
4 Likes
Have you ever tried to post something not hateful?
2 Likes
Man, 1:30sec of fuel and 45 rounds per gun, let’s not be dramatic little bro
1 Like
I mean there is no movement on the T64B to 10.0 while stuff like the amx40 and shir 2 go to 10.0?
hes not hating, hes stating facts, the type 81 is not an 11.7 SPAA at all mate.
1 Like
I wouldn’t mind it going up in a decompression but I don’t know what to think about this.
T-64B USSR > 10.0 , reason, its got access to good optics, has ERA LRF and access to 3BM42
Check out the forum - all his posts are hateful towards everybody who disagree with him. He even insults people who actually agree with him too
1 Like