MiG-21MF/SMT to 10.7 (bc it was fine at 10.7 and i played both of them= if the Mirage stays at 10.7 the MF/SMT should go up. if the SMT/MF gets to 10.7 the Mirage 3E can stay for now
J-7D to 11.0 /bc according to GJ the A-5C is just as good) which it isnt bc it so much better
Mirage 3E to 10.3 (bc the SMT/MF stays at 10.3 there is no reaason for the Mirage 3E to be at 10.7)
F-104G to 10.7 /at least the Italian one since its straight up worse than the German one)
Kurnass 2000 to 11.7 or 12.0 (bc the Python 3 are not really saving it at 12.3)
F-104G China to 10.3 (10.7 without flares and only speed is painfull)
Phantom FGR 2 all Britisch Phantoms to 11.7 (they dont have the kit to compete at 12.0)
This. The HOTs are useless anywhere but really long range. Under 200m you cannot even hit targets with them. most of the kills you get are with the main gun anyway.
Reason: It’s just a sidegrade to the Spitfire F. Mk IX, as it gets a bit lighter airframe with a bit less powerful engine compared to Mk. IX. It’s not a excuse for a much higher BR.
For starters, T-54 is one of the worst 8.0s and should arguably move down to 7.7. Also, that APFSDS isn’t decent as it’s just a reskin of the APDS round and is probably the worst dart in the game.
The game is heavily compressed around this area so pushing something up/down even a single BR step can have big consequences.
For this to be fixed you need BR decompression and moving only T-55A up would achieve nothing.
if u compare Type90(11.3) with M1A1 Click-Bait(11.7) in detail:
Mobility: similar in their tier, both excellect
Protection: similar in their tier, both average even below average (after gaijin “fix” Type90)
Firepower: 4s jm33 versus 5s m829a2
Gunning Optics: both having first-gen thermal but Type90 has a much worse optics zoom
Turret Rotation Speed: 30 °/s versus 40°/s
Vertical guidance: -7 / 10° versus -10 / 20°, yes Type90 can use controlled suspension to compensate vertical guidance but that also make its transmission having a glue feeling
MISC Device: Type90 having LWS versus Click-Bait having APS but barely usable
So Click-Bait has better optics, turret rotation speed, questionable better vertical guidance and superb APFSDS
Type90 has 1 second faster reloading speed and LWS
If raise Type90 to 11.7, Type90 should get a better APFSDS, not necessary Type10 level, maybe 570-550 pen level
Fun fact acording to statshark witch you are using.
ITPSV has 1.03 KD
marksman hs 1.00 KD
Yes ITPSV has more ground kills per death, but that could be explained by more people experienced players playing Sweden (who are not using it in its inteded AA role)
If we are talking about anti tank performance this vehicle is quite balanced in 8.7, but against air targets it should be 8.3 so pick your poison.
You replied on the wrong post This one is about AMX-30 DCA
Talking about pure performance this AA is way worse than others, but if you look at player stats, this vehicle overperfroms since more experienced players seem to play france.
If you are talking about the Marksman AA:s the ITPSV is better, but when comparing player stats (from statshark) ITPSV only has a better KD of 0.03.
The hull only makes a minor difference in the end and the reason why it is opressive is because it is more often in more experienced hands of players or players who are used to dying easier since sweden is more light oriented, so they play more flanky/carefully
Yea, i think Chief has less ground kils due to the fact it has atrocious mobility + it’s loud as heck, making its ability to flank and sneak around much worse.
Vehicle: BI
BR: 6.7 → 7.0 or 7.3
Reason: BI’s performance can single-handedly destroy matches, with its main deciding factor on whether or not you can win against one is by the BI’s competence.
Click bait should be 12.0 and the type 90 should goto 11.7 with the TKX (P) all theyre doing here is making it uselss to use the TKX(P) as you wont be able to get the 10.3 downtiers u do with the type90s