Nor is expecting L23 to be suffecient vs a T-90A. Even L23A1 or L26 can be inconsistant vs these higher tier tanks.
I think 10.0 is going to be rough for it without extremely careful shot placement. Definetly could do with a better shell, but its looking like it might have the best one available
Yes however the different of the type 90 and leopard 2a4 would be 1 instead of 0.7, whilst the difference between toptier and the type 90 stays the same, thus relieving pressure whilst keeping balance.
who cares. It’s still good, and the mobility debuff isn’t relevant considering how you have to play the tank defensively. Don’t agree with this take. Chieftain mk3 is superior to the M60AOS in almost every regards but reload and mobility… only slightly. Sometimes an upgrade is so minimal that it doesn’t justify a br change, and the cheiftain mk3/5 fits that.
It has challenger mk2 armour, just give it a better round with the br increase. the challengers are great tanks, below average mobility (still fast enough to do anything you need to do in a ground rb game) for superior armour protection.
idk why people are defending such a blantely overpowered tank. It get’s 10.7 levels of protection at an entire br lower. Whether its british or russian, OP tanks need to be balanced.
Might be unpopular, but i believe the MiG-23ML, MLA and MLD should be moved up in BR.
MiG-23ML/MiG-23MLA/MiG-23MLD
Air Realistic Battles
BR: 11.7 → 12.0
Why? Simply the R24R missile is just too good and doesn’t belong potentially fighting 10.7 aircraft. Instead of moving other aircraft like the J35XS down in BR because they suffer from the ML i feel like the MiG-23ML should be instead be moved up.
I feel like the Mirage F1C gets that treatment because of its missile, the Magic 2. Its another (probably worse) airframe than the ML bumped up in BR because of it being able to carry two great missiles.
What’s funny is the jumbo is still a bully, and hardly saw any nerfs.
The obj. 279 may have been under br’d at 8.3, but 8.7 was well rounded. It is not hard to fight.
The KV-1E shares the same weaknesses as its predecessor, so it makes little sense to be so “OP” it’s good, don’t get me wrong, but not 4.3 material unless it gets a new shell.
lol not even! People who shoot quick and don’t aim are the ones having the problem. It takes all of one second to hit the gun and it’s very easy to disable, which usually kills 2-3 crew, and it’s forced to retreat. Hit the drivers port and it’s 1 tapped.
Even it’s angled, the turret is still easily penned
I don’t agree with the FV 4030 going to 10.0. Mainly because Britain has no line up there and the FV 4030 has a very weak lower plate. I get its a challenger prototype but it would be just like what they did with the rooikat 105 they put it up with no lineup other then the FV 4030
Reasoning: The Phantom should stay at 12.0 if it recieves its historical AIM 9L instead of its current AIM 9G. If the AIM 9L is not added, it should be reduced to 11.7. Only AIM 9G in the potential of a 13.0 uptier against common 30g+ all aspect missiles its balanced. Have a worse RWR, and lack the Agile Eagle slats.