Mode: Ground Realistic Battles
Vehicle: Merkava Mk.2D
Change: 9.7 > 9.7
Reasoning: The Merkava Mk.2D is a durable vehicle due to its armor and module layout. However, it is not excellent when looking at firepower and armor, and does not perform as well as a BR 10.0 deserves. I suggest that this vehicle should not be changed from BR 9.7.
Yak-9K and other 45mm-equipped Russian aircraft
REMOVE APHE. I think that’s pretty self-explanatory.
9.7 → 9.7?
That means no changes to the BR
Ah okay, so you are just referring to the currently planed BR move of these vehicles
Compared to those vehicles, the Merkava would certainly be slightly better armored. However, both Leopard1 and AMX-30 have excellent mobility instead of armor. On the other hand, I would say that Merkava does not have superior mobility and is less survivable.
Least biased US main.
Lol. No.
Thats simply everything up and US down, thats dreamthinking, not helpfull for ballancing and also wont ever go through.
Mode: GRB
Vehicle: Type 81 C
Change: Leave it at 11.3
Reason: Sure the missile is nice and all, but it’s still a radarless system with only gen 1 thermals that sucks at engaging helicopters (with no AA alternatives to deal with them).
It’s a system with pretty serious hard limits, it’s fine where it is.
conveniently doesn’t mention the fact that the SU-30SM have SIXXXXXXXXXX more missiles
The PL-8B changes nothing on the plane hello?
helllll yeah 9M slinger at TWELVEEEE POINT SEVEN this is a GOOD CHANGE
What are you COOKING
Hunter at 8.7 i feel like we’ve done this before
The F-86K watching in HORROR as the Aardvark NUKES it from orbit
NO??? WHAT???
R-73s at ELEVEN POINT ZERO lmfaooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
HMD MAGIC 2 AT TWELVEEEEE POINT ZEROO
im tweaking man never suggest again
Yes, lets under BR US stuff again!
Dude Rad90 is one of the most armored light tanks in the game.
Good thing that subsonic platform won’t be able to use it that effectively as you need clear rear aspect shots while being pretty close.
TKX(P) - 11.3 as other type 90. not only it breaks the lineups for japan, but its also does not make any sense. TKXP is slower than type 90, carries less ammo in its autoloader and the only stand out feature is reverse speed that is never used to this extent and better optics. everything else is the same or worse
the FLARELESSS SUBSONICS watching PAINFULLY as the SU-25SM3 fires a THRUST VECTORING IRCCM MISSILE at them in FRONT ASPECT
Air RB: Hunter F1 (9.0->8.7) Hunter F1 has a poor engine; it is definitely worse than cl mk6 or f3h. It should go against mig 17 & 15, f86
Air RB: Sagittarro2 (9.3->9.0) Since Ariete is much better than Sag2, sag2 should have a lower BR
You don’t need IRCCM missiles to dunk on flareless planes my dude.
Do you really think they’re going to take your request seriously when you can’t even get the most basic information right ?
Man, what did the KV-1S do to you to deserve this fate?
I mentioned T1E1 90 and MBT in other cases I mentioned ammo and reload and br increase if it will perform like with XM-1 because with ammo and reload it could work at 9.7-10.0 , so nice try…
IPM1
11.3 → 11.0 or → 11.3
Reason: Currently it shares its br with the now better M1A1 since the M1A1 got a reload buff to 5 seconds while retaining better firepower and having an equal reload. The IPM1 currently would fit better to the 11.0 bracket
or just remove the 5 second reload from the M1A1 specifically and keep it 11.3