Type 81 (C)
If you plan to raise a short-range flack without radar to 11.7 and thus also fall out of a playable lineup and Japan again has no more flak from 9.3 to the end
Then I expect you to raise the Strella flack, which operates in the same way, by at least 1 BR for all nations.
The same applies to the 2S38 which operates in the same way as an Otomatic at 11.3 only a complete BR further down.
So step up the 2S38 or step down the Otomatic to 10.7
what the heck is this logic, so you’re saying it is ok to just move them up because they’re always getting uptiered?
Nah J-7D need to be move higher.
Vehicle: Falcon
Gamemode: Ground RB
Change: 8.3 > 7.7 (APDS deletion)
Reason: The APDS on this vehicle is extremely threatening and I believe it needs to be modified. I suggest that instead of removing the APDS for this vehicle, the BR be set to 7.7.
True, only larpers use APHE instead of APDS or darts at 8.3 and above, but I guess this is off topic.
Mode: Naval RB
Vehicle: USS Des Moines
BR Change: 6.3 > 6.0
Reasoning:
Bad armor, bad shell room and magazine placement making it easy to ammo rack.
Firepower inadequate for the battle rating and versus Battleships and Battlecruisers
GRB
Radkampfwagen 90
10.0 → 9.7
Reason:
Sure it has good mobility, BUT No Thermal, No LWS, Paper armor and an aced 6.7 reload with just DM33
totally agreed 200/100 comment
Mode: GRB
Vehicle: AMX-40
Change: Leave it at 9.7
Reason: There’s literally no 10.0 lineup for France, what the hell is it gonna do alone?
Also its round would be insufficient to deal with targets in uptiers.
This nerf is just completely uncalled for.
Freccia IFV
10.7 → 11.0
RB
Reason:
Good Mobility, good firerate of the autocannon, has access to 10 Spikes missiles, good Thermal, has LWS/LRF
Bo 105 PAH-1
9.3 → 9.0
Currently it’s worse than the PAH-1A1 in every way but at the same BR. And it’s even worse than the Tzefa B which is at 9.0.
Bo 105 CB-2
9.3 → 9.0
Currently worse in every way to the Tzefa B which is at 9.0.
From 9.3 to 9.3?
Merkava 1 and 2 armour is definitely better than the Leopard 1, AMX-30 and the like.
Mode: Ground Realistic Battles
Vehicle: Merkava Mk.2D
Change: 9.7 > 9.7
Reasoning: The Merkava Mk.2D is a durable vehicle due to its armor and module layout. However, it is not excellent when looking at firepower and armor, and does not perform as well as a BR 10.0 deserves. I suggest that this vehicle should not be changed from BR 9.7.
Yak-9K and other 45mm-equipped Russian aircraft
REMOVE APHE. I think that’s pretty self-explanatory.
9.7 → 9.7?
That means no changes to the BR
Ah okay, so you are just referring to the currently planed BR move of these vehicles
Compared to those vehicles, the Merkava would certainly be slightly better armored. However, both Leopard1 and AMX-30 have excellent mobility instead of armor. On the other hand, I would say that Merkava does not have superior mobility and is less survivable.