worse mobility & lose commander sight for better armor & era. id say they are equal.
both sure are better than the 8.3 t-95e anyway.
1 Like
Was just thinking hte loss of all-aspect rather than necessarily raw missile performance (R-60M ----> R-60s) , but you are probably right
yeah, that whole usa 8.3 lineup probably could have stayed 8.0
1 Like
ok, maybe I went overboard with the 11.7, but for the 12.3 it carries too little armament and has a low top speed
Well… Its a subosnic aircraft, but one of the fastest accelerating Subsonic aircrafts, so… it fiddly on that front.
It could get 6x Aim-9M, but Id fear that would push it too 12.7 and Id kinda prefer to save that as an “upgrade” for the GR9A.
For now though, I think we just need to continue fighting for various buffs for the Harriers in general. They are underperforming rather significantly.
I don’t think a long 88 should be a lower br than the m36, casemate or not. nashorn is quite effective even up to 6.7.
that reasons more for putting the m26 at 6.3. or 6.0 given the historical panther equivalence but I think that’s wrong.
its worse than the bmp2m at the same br, and both are worse than the 2s25m at a lower br. annoying =/= good.
you cant really compare it to the m36, which has a excellent mobility and a turret… with great gun handling too.
nashorn is too weak, clunky and bulky to really be that usefull in at any br. its basically a faster velocity faster reload dicker max with less he filler.
2 Likes
Gaijin just too trust the Air Force in naval battle, at least before 8.0, the bots will easily shoot down all of the aircraft, and there is nothing too OP before 8.0
sure, but its worse armored than the t26e5 with much slower reload. the extra pen isnt really worth it.
e5 should go up too with it.
oh yeah, definetly, could at least go to 8.0 without much issues, but alas. This is Gaijin we are talking about
TA152C RB: 6.3-5.7
DO335 is generally better than TA152c, whatever the top speed or the firepower, and DO335B has better mobility at high speed.
2 Likes
I never trust those naval developers, they are too arrogant and conceited
give the single intern a break, he is rather overworked :P
Remove apfsds? Why not play the 87(p)?
1 Like
2s38 is really strong together with bmp-2m. 2s25m being undertiered doesnt justify them being under br’d.
2s38 > otomatic.
bmp-2m > cv9030 mk4.
change my mind
well a good point, but id actually rather play the (p) even now, its much better agains light targets.
you’re acting like the gun has the same pen as the dicker. for tds like m36 and nashorn its all about the gun, and id much rather have the gun that can pen any tank it fights easily and put up with a casemate, than have a turret with that much worse of a gun. The m36 is effectively a non casemate dicker (same pen same velocity but 1/3rd the filler), looking at it that way i.e m36 being an upgraded dicker with its turret, an upgraded dicker with a better gun being the same br makes perfect sense.
i meant to say sturer emil with 248mm pen, i always confuse the two, anyway.
i prefer manuverability and gunhandling over raw penetration in most cases.
m36 can already lol pen everything it can face. do you really need more?
1 Like