Nope. All of them got the same buffs.
1 Like
And in RB10.0, there is a stronger Leopard 2K in the same room, and the German RB10.0 has a full queue, but France does not
1 Like
I find it very unreliable personally, mostly with the release controls being uh inconstant.
Don’t get me wrong I’ve had some luck. But in GRB I’d rather just use the CCIP and/or bombsight, especially for SEAD
Has anyone mentioned that the Naval BR system has been crashed? we need another BR extend for Naval toptier, unless someone believes that BB and CL could be same BR
1 Like
Fair enough. Though I really want a 10.0 tornado for GRB so I can loft bombs or make ultra low passes using CCRP. Half the reason why I wanted GMR modeled was for exactly that kind of CCRP control
I keep trying to make passes like that in my 9.7 Harriers, always end up bomb tossing or flinging rockets from 5km or something lmao. The Gepard and Friends are nasty up close lmao, though I commonly find people trying to blast me from outside their effective range, the tracer fire gives me a target at least.
the other A-7s are oddly high br too in air. their sub sonic flightmodels arent all that great. they feel like 9.7-10.0 planes to me.
also why is the A-7E higher br than the A-7D? the very slightly better aim-9G is not worth a br increase over the 9J variant imo.
3 Likes
A7E 100% needs AGM65E/F, which is similar with A10A late but no aim9L
2 Likes
Really need Phimat on the GR3, then you can just start dumping mass loads of Chaff to help throw the Radar locks on those. Might help a little, but betwene the Harriers IR sig issues and that BR for CAS in general, yeah, GR3 sounds rough.
i was talking about air rb, but i dont see a reason to not add them to it.
its being hugely overshadowed by the a-10 late in ground at the same br.
its been mentioned a couple times in the past +1700 posts
but since air, ground, and naval BR changes are lumped into the same thread they get buried rather quickly
1 Like
revert back the merkavas BRs to 9.3 and the mk2d to 9.7, they shouldn’t be that high up.
this is an uptier hell.
1 Like
Eh, it’s in an okay place, the issue is more what surrounds it, it’s just okay in a sea of fairly exceptional options, hell even in it’s own tree the Buccaneers are arguably better cas, outside that the SU-25 & A-4s are pretty exceptional. I personally rate it about on par with the Alphajet, just a little better in most ways.
Yeah… They are trying to decompress by lowering the BR of ships rather than raising them.
Which is Gaijin’s definition of Decompression…
But I fear half the issue is that they dont want to massively decompress naval without doing the same to air. That way you dont have something like a Buc S2 bombing top tier battleships.
Yeah, could really do with being 9.3, then at least it would make a half decent CAP option.
1 Like
The F-20A is not AMRAAM capable. I believe mockups of the missile was mounted on the wing when neither Tigershark nor AMRAAM had been fully developed at the time. It was planned for the Tigershark to use AMRAAMs if it went into production, but the Tigershark project was cancelled before it gained the ability to fire AMRAAMs. Iirc the Aim-120 went into service after the Tigershark’s cancellation.
1 Like
Mode: air realistic battles
Aircraft: F-4J, FGR.1 and FGR.2
Br change: 12.0 → 11.7
Reasoning:
Can we PLEASE move down the British Phantoms and the F-4J? 12.0 is a very rough bracket for those aircraft. 11.7 would be a HUGE quality of life improvement.
As it is, they’re all dead content. The British ones especially. They’re effectively worse than the F-4E, due to the lack of 7Fs, an internal gun, and lack of slats.
Also, all of these start with two 9Ds stock and no radar missiles. Trying to stock grind that at 12.0 is near impossible.
4 Likes
F-20 wasnt a test candidate for AMRAAM while it was being developed, primarily because the F-20 was more of a private venture rather than an official US government project and was seeking the export market but the lack of any prospective buyers due to its costs killed it before AMRAAM’s were finished
separate BRs for planes in air/ground already exist, no reason for naval not to get a similar treatment
alternatively, just remove the option of bringing your own planes to naval battles altogether, that way they dont have to bother coming up with separate BRs for lord knows how many planes
Or the newest bug where one blade of grass between you and an enemy ship causes your gunners to shoot the water 500 meters in front of your boat. This makes it really attractive to new players who blaze out into the open anyway. “Cover? Why do I need cover? I’m in a destroyer!”
1 Like