Does locking onto them do anything with either modes?
FV4030 stays at 9.7 it’s actually pretty well balanced there.
3 Likes
Pzh-2000 7.7 → 8.0
3 Likes
I kinda agree, though I don’t really like how the T-55AM1 would just be 0.7 difference in BR with it.
It’s already 7.7 in GRB
It’s armor, gun, reload, and gun handling are better on the Shir 2 tho
1 Like
Exactly my point.
1.0 BR difference makes sense.
If T-55AM gets moved up to 9.0, and Shir 2 stays at 9.7, it would be a 0.7 BR difference.
1 Like
pls make this happen and make first flanker great again :>
Mode:Simulator
Vehicle: Su-27
Change: 13.3 → 13.0
Reasons: it would stop being near useless in air sim matches because there is no good reason to use it over su-27sm/su-30sm since all of them fight against 14.0 planes every rotation anyway.
lots of 13.3 planes but zero 13.0 in USSR tree currently !
1 Like
I see what you mean.
Also Shir 2 has much better reverse speed and gun depression.
Yeah, but it’s not really 10.0 worthy. No thermals, okay speed. Etc.
The ZA-35 8.3 → 8.7
or just give the FV4030/3 its IRL L23A1
GIven we have no 9.7 line-up anyway, making a decent 10.0 out of it so it can be used alongside things like the DW, Stormer AD and Rapier just makes more sense
4 Likes
Gepard 8.3 → 8.7
1 Like
I get that, but its either bullying 8.7s, or getting slightly bullied by 10.0+.
Its only problem imo at 10.0 would be the dart
no bro wtf
How much angle pen does it have at 60 degrees?
I mean a gen 1 thermal would be nice
1 Like
Same shell used on the challenger mk2 and I do okay with it
L23 for side by side comaprison
1 Like
Mode: Ground Realistic Battle
Tank: Chinese M60A3 TTS
Change: 9.0 → 8.7
Reasoning: the chinese M60A3 despite the lack of blazer ERA and the worst apfsds shell is sharing the same br as it’s american counterpart which make absolutly no sense. I propose to lower it’s br down to 8.7 with will greatly help it as it will not face 10.0 tanks anymore and will give it a more viable line up composed of the 8.7 and 8.3 chinese spaa and mediums
5 Likes