The same happens with AMX A-1
alright the strv 103C can go to 9.0 BR only if it gets the seperated engines cuz it just doesnt make sense to have a non stabilised cheese wedge facing 10.0 tanks where youll get penned by everything. If the VT1-2 can hull aim with its engine destroyed so should the double engined cheese wedge then.
3 Likes
us and british spaa are already more than capable to destroy them it isn’t that good and wouldn’t compare to the rooivalk
It wouldn’t be a round of br changes without France getting kicked in the nuts lmao. The only one that makes sense for tanks is the AMX M4
Does locking onto them do anything with either modes?
FV4030 stays at 9.7 it’s actually pretty well balanced there.
3 Likes
Pzh-2000 7.7 → 8.0
3 Likes
I kinda agree, though I don’t really like how the T-55AM1 would just be 0.7 difference in BR with it.
It’s already 7.7 in GRB
It’s armor, gun, reload, and gun handling are better on the Shir 2 tho
1 Like
Exactly my point.
1.0 BR difference makes sense.
If T-55AM gets moved up to 9.0, and Shir 2 stays at 9.7, it would be a 0.7 BR difference.
1 Like
pls make this happen and make first flanker great again :>
Mode:Simulator
Vehicle: Su-27
Change: 13.3 → 13.0
Reasons: it would stop being near useless in air sim matches because there is no good reason to use it over su-27sm/su-30sm since all of them fight against 14.0 planes every rotation anyway.
lots of 13.3 planes but zero 13.0 in USSR tree currently !
1 Like
I see what you mean.
Also Shir 2 has much better reverse speed and gun depression.
Yeah, but it’s not really 10.0 worthy. No thermals, okay speed. Etc.
The ZA-35 8.3 → 8.7
or just give the FV4030/3 its IRL L23A1
GIven we have no 9.7 line-up anyway, making a decent 10.0 out of it so it can be used alongside things like the DW, Stormer AD and Rapier just makes more sense
4 Likes
Gepard 8.3 → 8.7
1 Like
I get that, but its either bullying 8.7s, or getting slightly bullied by 10.0+.
Its only problem imo at 10.0 would be the dart
no bro wtf