With the Charioteer having its turret armor weakened and ammo placement changed, I’d say its time for it to be moved down in BR from 6.3 to 6.0 for GRB. That or the addition of its historical ready rack which is 3 rounds reloading at 4.3 seconds.
24 Likes
Aircraft: Kurnass 2000
Game mode: Air Realistic
BR change: 12.3 → 12.0
Reason: Kurnass 2000 have only IR missiles as A2A weaponary, it’s lacking SARH missiles. The missile itself doesn’t have IRCCM, and this means that this jet is barely playable against 13.0-13.3 aircraft. Even in comparison with Japanese F-4EJ Kai (which sits at the same BR as Kurnass 2000) it have worse capabilities in this mode, despite both sharing the same platform.
15 Likes
Q-5L to 10.0??? Really?
Why not just cave in to the numerous reports and just give it PL-5Bs and pop it to 10.7, would actually give it some use in Air RB and not let it be complete fodder.
28 Likes
Thanks im pretty sure i will not stop
if the merkava mk2d is going up in br it should be moved up a rank
2 Likes
The H-34 shouldn’t be moved up to 8.0 for no other reason than that it is hilarious to fire Bullpups from a helicopter at 7.7. It’s not really able to cause a lot of damage either, considering you can only ever fire at one target before having to reload.
But then remember R73 and R27ER, which will be quite strong af as CAP against 10.3 planes u might see, lol
2 Likes
I am disappointed that there is no Ground/Naval Top Tier decompression, missing or historical shells added (KE-W A2, M829A3…)
However, I am VERY happy to finally see Air 13.0 for Ground.
That means that at least I can limit myself to playing 11.7 in order to avoid the Rafale/SU/EF disease that’s ruining the top BR.
EDIT: additionally:
Merkava Mk.2D: receive M426, its historical shell.
Since there is an insistence on bumping this tank’s BR higher and higher for no objective reason every time, at least it should have at 10.0 the same shell that many 9.3s already have.
21 Likes
Ofc,japanese players starts crying like madmen when you take out that toy. Don’t worry buddy,destroying your precious privileges is my main mission <3
Ground RB, AMX-13(HOT), BR 8.3→7.0 , I made the same proposal last time and will petition for the same this time as well. As long as HOT missiles are not practical, this guy is no different than an AMX-13 (75) operationally.
35 Likes
no? I play early jets quite often, I also have the first 2 R2Y2s so I know how they perform
Because napalm bomb’s I guess. However it should be like analogue (with missiles) to A-5C in the first place.
Mode: Ground Realistic Battles
Vehicle: Type 90/ Type 90(B)/ Type 90 (B) “Fuji”
BR Change: 11.3 > 11.7
Reasoning:
They have the same capabilities as TKX(P) which is moving to BR of 11.7 and should be moved as well.
(yes i own “Fuji” and yes i know what it’s capable of)
27 Likes
Arcade/Realistic Tank
Increase Max br to 13.0
Reason: Decompression is real
20 Likes
Mode: GRB
Vehicle: Nashorn Tank Destroyer.
BR Change: 5.3 to 5.0
Reasons: Yes, a very capable gun but thats is all good. Movility is mediocre, very poor armor and suvivability, lack of a turret even his machineguns are very limited and in the most of the cases are useless.
4 Likes
Throw in the better shell and we have a deal
3 Likes
Mode: GRB
Vehicle: T26E1-1
BR Change: 6.7 to 7.0 or 7.3
Reasons: The enhanced armor gives it a definite advantage over the other 6.7-rated vehicles currently in use
4 Likes
Su22m3
More countermeasures should be taken while keeping BR unchanged.
At present, its BR settings are the same as those of MiG27, Su22M4, Su22um3k and other aircraft, and its flight performance and combat (especially air combat) capabilities are not significantly different from those like Su22um3k and other aircraft. But its countermeasures are clearly fewer and completely insufficient (12 vs 256+12), which is completely unreasonable.
4 Likes
Merkava 1/2 to 9.7 wtf gaijin???
10 Likes
not up to me, but to the devs