Planned Battle Rating changes for April 2025

11.7-14.0 of Air RB needs a complete rework that so many planes completely unplayable when get
full uptiered. How th can u encounter a Rafale or Typhoon with one of ANY 13.0br planes, even playing a prop or early jet u still have a way to encounter full downtiered guys
but not only of them
F-104S TAF (11.3>11.0)
Mirage F1C-200 (12.0>11.7)
They are all lack of a2a gameplay experience, overperformed by EVERY plane at it’s BR (e.g. F-104S vs F-4E, Mirage F1 vs F4S…or even MiG-23MLD, etc)
Oh and F/A-18A/C Early overperforming everyone making every plane at same br like a clown

25 Likes

Slightly isn’t enough for that big of a BR change. It’s also still very funny that the Me-262, Me-163, and the R2Y2 get to face jets from the Korean War

Type 81 (C)
Mode: Ground RB
BR change: 11.7 (proposed) → 11.3 (No change).

This vehicle is simply incomparable to the ADATS, and furthermore, by moving it to 11.7, it’s essentially being relegated to the 12.0 lineup, at which BR it is entirely outclassed.

80 Likes

Leopard 2A5 PSO
RB
12.0 → 11.7/11.3
While stile being an good tank, its not even close to an Leopard 2A7V which sits at the same BR but with an MUCH better Gun, MUCH better TVD, maybe gave it an worse dart, but as now the Premium Leopard 2A4M CAN feels MUCH better than the 2A5 PSO due to having MUCH better TVD at an lower BR

9 Likes

Ground RB, AMX-13 (FL11) : 4.3 > 4.0 (or even 3.7 like in the past).

This thing is not better than the M24 or the AMX-13-M24, while it’s BR is way too high. It should be decreased to either 4.0 or 3.7 like the two other one.

58 Likes

Ground RB, 2C (Char FCM 2C), BR 2.3→2.0, If you think in order from T-28, this tank should be 2.0. I don’t know why the BR would go up two steps.

21 Likes

german one is worse than the other two since no IRST

Nah man I rhunk its fine a 8.0 got a nuke in it in my first 10 matches nit even having aphe. And after that its still my favorite nuke tank after turm iii

1 Like

RB Ozelot 9.7> 9.3 He has no advantages over his rivals and he perfectly fits into the seitap of Germany at 9.3

10 Likes

It’s F-15A with 3x GBU-8 loadout

so you like that people is suffering?

Where did they pull those BRs from jeez

2 Likes

i made separate ones for GE, UK and Italy

Yet again the The Freccia P-493 which has 3 x 40mm or 2 x 40mm and 2x torpedoes, with the survivability of a wet napkin is staying at 4.7.
The SKR7 with 2x twin 76mm autocannons, 144x RBU-6000 mortars, 5 x torpedoes and the survivability of a mobile bunker is unmoving from 4.3.
Makes sense.

6 Likes

PUMA VJTF
GRB 11.0 → 10.7

No lineup, Spikes that don’t work well, and tracks that blow off when spikes are shot (making you a free kill). This thing deserves to be 10.7, as does the KF41, but rules are rules, because of how much better the Vilkas and other spike carriers at 10.7 are.

And before anyone mentions its armor, don’t, it only stops HEATFS, something you 9/10 times are not going to see.

36 Likes

But what is with the other 7.7s they are worse because they don’t have aphe

Mode: Air Realistic Battles

Aircraft: J7W1 (JPN)

6.0 → 5.7

The J7W1 is heavily lacking in every aspect of flight performance, but above all climb rate and maneuverability, two of the most important factors in Air RB. It should be moved down to reflect this.

24 Likes

jp_type_90b_camo

How about adjusting the Type 90 Fuji in the battle rating? It is still being spammed and performs exceptionally well at its battle rating, and when playing at 10.3 or 10.7, it simply outshines everything in the matches.

LG

24 Likes

Naval RB, Dupleix : 5.7 > 5.3.

It is the same class as the Colbert (that is BR 5.3), and while its slightly more armored,it has less gun and is also slower. It’s already one of the weakeast heavy cruiser in the game and should be 5.3 along the Colbert. It does not deserve to be at 5.7.

19 Likes

fair enuf ig