Chieftain Mk.10
Ground RB
9.0 → 9.7
With the Rapier moving down to 9.7 a decent line up is forming at 9.7, missing (with the moving up of the FV4030/3) an MBT, therefore I am suggesting we redesignate the Mk.10 as a Mk.11 early, which would give it thermals (Also give it the historically correct L23A1). And we could somewhat ahistorically give it L26 for added punch. And move it to 9.7.
If they reallyyy wanted to they could give it R-73s but i dont know if that is the best idea. Maybe an indigenous iranian Fox-2 would be more appropriate.
So it seems like we have the same experience. The Fakour and R-27R are good, but the rest of the kit falls short. For me, it’s the engines and RWR. I cannot use a set of 12.0 engines and a 12.0 RWR at 13.0. And for me, it’s the reason it’s not 13.0 material. The RWR reliability is questionable (pun intended), and the engines are genuinely some of the worst mismatches on an airframe. Half of the requirements for doing good in a match is if you can get an airspawn or not because the climb rate is that bad. I agree that it needs the fuel tanks though.
For the flight model, I think it’s awesome, but it needs that instantaneous turn that comes with the AoA limit disable button. Other than that I agree.
For months we have been asking for decompression for naval and you can’t make it, because it isn’t air or ground right?
1 Like
Mode: Ground Realistic Battles
Vehicles: 11.0 to 12.0
Change: Decompression!! Make max BR 13.0
Reasoning: 90% of 10.7 matches are uptiers to 11.3 or 11.7. Love how I can’t even play my 70$ pixel tank because every game I get matched against another 75$ pixel tank (Al-Khalid, Abrams etc…) that can go through me everywhere meanwhile I can’t even breach T-80’s gun half the time or Abrams LFP with my weak shell.
M551 8.3 → M551A1 8.3 (ground RB)
Change the designation to the M551A1 and give it the laser rangefinder (this seems to be the only difference between the M551 and the M551A1).
This will make the tank much more competitive in an uptier, as seen with the M60A2, which shares the same cannon and ammunition as the M551, but also includes a laser rangefinder unlike the current iteration of the M551 ingame. Currently the lack of a laser rangefinder is what makes the M551 extremely lacking especially whilst uptiered having to compete with the likes of the BMD-4.
I believe it would be best to see the performance of the M551A1 at 8.3 before deciding if it will still need to be moved down in BR by the time of the next BR changes.
Also this means that the new M551A1 could stay exactly where it is in the tech tree and not be swapped with the XM800T
4 Likes
See R73 honestly might be worse as i use the current missiles for 2-3km shots from above, R73 struggles to get speed and hit at range a lot. If there is a domestic missile it used then sure but R73 without HMD is not really worth it imo.
FYI, M24 are 3.3 in GAB. :|
Just giving some extra info
1 Like
AMX 40 going to 10.0 is criminal. We got a botched VEXTRA so it would not go higher than 9.7 to remain in the 9.7 lineup (with other butchered vehicles, say hello to the ROLAND elevation and the AMX 40 armor composite), and then you are telling me it’s going higher in BR ?
If you want to increase the BR of the AMX40, go all in : Give its composite back, put it at 10.3 along side the VEXTRA with its correct shell.
9 Likes
move 2s38 up pls
1 Like
Move Kurnass 2000 down in AirRB. It’s not 12.3 material. Now it’s at the same br as F-18A and F-16 while being phantom with only IR non irccm missiles.
Iran doesn’t really have indigenous stuff. Everything they have is remade American stuff. It should get R-73s.
No, thats because decompression in Naval would leave singular vehicles in entire BR ranges and Naval is the only mode where i would ever let the “but what about queue times” argument satnd as the times are already approaching 5 minutes at Rank III
1 Like
Itd still be a step up from the AIM-9P used on the IRIAF. Yeah it wouldnt be as flexible as it would be with an HMD, but it still be an upgrade.
1 Like
Vehicle : Vextra 105
BR change : 9.7->10.0
Why : add OFL 105 F2
OR
Vehicle : AMX-40
BR change : 10.0->9.7
Why : moving the AMX-40 up in BR would hurt the 9.3-9.7 line-up
10 Likes
I am sure other people have said it before but AMX 13 moving to 7.0 makes very little sense. It has no advantage over its competition in actual battle both bull dogs are about as mobile in a practical sense and get better rounds to deal with high armored threats. Now it will fight things that will be even more armored, Maus, IS3, IS4M not to mention M26 is now left by itself at 6.7 so there is no line up for that tank at all. AMX M4 is not equivalent to an M46 the tank get heat it gets aphe and its mobility is roughly the same.
1 Like
Imagine driving this barely moving thing at 10.7, adding better dart or thermals won’t make this tank any more useful to justify it going to 9.7 just for lineup’s sake
1 Like
I was thinking the Fatter-1 or 2
Though i dont really know the specs of it. Its based off of the AIM-9P though.
Ídeally every BR would be top tier once in a while.
Like today 12.3 is top in bracket tomorrow 12.7.
do you think moving the jaguar GR.1 would be possible for Air RB? being at 9.7, its slaughtered in 10.7 uptiers.