just everything lol… armor/gun/mobility 279 only miss laser ranefinder but it is not so necessary
Oh dear i played the UK and I agree that their gun is probably the worst in game, but that’s no reason to up the French vehicles.
Yeah the M4 is probably better than a Tiger II, but they also don’t have the same role, but I was refering to the AMX 13 in my previous post
r2y2 (all)
rb
8.0->7.3
they have equal if not same performance as other 7.3 planes
5 Likes
Uk 90mm, unless you mean the ratel one which isnt british im not sure what you mean here
Im sorry but thats a skill issue on your end then, i have a good KD at 13.0 in my IRIAF and to call it the worst 13.0 is because people can’t accept the fact it can’t sealclub nearly as easily as it once could.
2 Likes
Mode: Air Realistic Battles
Vehicle: F-14B
Change: Add AIM-9M and AIM-7P
Reasoning: At 13.0 battle rating, aircraft such as the F-15A, Su-27, MiG-29G, all feature all-aspect, IRCCM heatseeking missiles on superior airframes than the F-14B. I understand the justification for the battle rating is the F-14B’s possession of Fox-3 AIM-54 Phoenixes and technical improvements over the F-14A Early model, however, aircraft such as the F-4F at 13.0 also feature far better performing Fox-3s than the AIM-54 with IRCCM heatseeking missiles as well.
The AIM-9M was historically used on the F-14B, and the F-14B is also a much newer, more modern aircraft than some aircraft that also feature AIM-9Ms currently in the game, such as the F-15A. Additionally, the new AIM-7P was also used on the F-14B, and although this would add only a slight improvement over the M model, it would further make this aircraft worth using over the superior F-15A and Su-27 airframes, to name a few examples.
4 Likes
This! When stock grinding the A-10C, I had so many matches that ended before I even saw a single enemy, it takes over 5-6 minutes to reach map center. It needs air spawn so bad. Really don’t know what is keeping Gaijin from doing it, the mechanic is already in the game and used by lower tier planes.
2 Likes
So great it collected total of… 1 like.
Have I confused you with someone else? I was only talking about the M4 the entire time. The AMX 13 change is senseless in every way possible
Unusual request:
ALL MODES
Minor nations should have their statistics given a negative weighting applied throughout the trees. If French shermans or B-26s which are the same in every aspect to US counterparts for example, but have a 3 or 4% higher winrate basis, then the whole tree should be given a negative weighting of 3-4% applied to the tree throughout so we can stop dealing with Gaijin consistently over-tiering minor nation vehicles every single planned BR change.
Otherwise this systemic issue will not be fixed. This is a systemic issue to how the statistics are being read.
8 Likes
20 pounder, which is the closest equivalent the UK had to a 90mm same as the german 88 and the russian 85. all similar enough in calibre to be compareable.
kfir canard
air rb
11.0 → 10.7
reasoning: low countermeasure amount, only 2 9Gs, no radar and a very bad RWR
3 Likes
You still haven’t stated why you think the IRIAF isn’t the worst 13.0. What gave you that high KD and how is it better than the average 13.0?
What is with Isreal’s Merkava’s and Namer getting Up tiered. Namer is not a good and barely seen on the battlefield. Not only are you nerfing an already bad vehicle, but the few who do still enjoy it will stop playing it. Merkava’s can be good so I can understand to some extent, but they are inconsistent compared to similarly tiered Russian variants (T-64 / T72) which are faster better armored, similar reload speed, and better darts. Overall, Isreal is getting hit pretty hard without much reason.
3 Likes
My bad, misread the original post you replied to…
Gamemode: Ground Realistic Battles
Vehicle: Merkava Mk.1/2s and Merkava Mk.2D
Change: Add M426 (DM63 105mm APFSDS) to the Merkava Mk.2D AND Lower the reload rate of the Merkava Mk.1/2s to 5.0-6.0 seconds. No BR changes.
It’s the latest serving Merkava Mk.2 we have ingame, and the Magachs that served before it even have this round. If you’re going to uptier the sadest Merkava to 10.0, it needs a round that lets it be viable at this BR. I would also like to recommend a lower reload rate for these vehicles, as has been passed as a suggestion here: Community Bug Reporting System
A 6.7s aced reload, commonly seen as 7.1s for expert crews which players will tend to use, is quite unviable given the slow mobility, poor armor, and lower end round. The fact the 120mm Merkava Mk.3s are out reloading these things is a joke, even if it’s intended for balance, their puspose has been worn out given the new BR of these vehicles.
9 Likes
Fair enough, was just clarifying, thanks
I know it’s useless, but still…
RN Ghibli, 4.0 → 3.0, slow firing 100 mm cannons, very poor survivability, no armor, destroyers spawn, nothing justifies this boat to sit that high in BR.
1 Like
Mode: Ground RB
Vehicle: Type 69
Change: 8.0 - > 8.3
LRF and dual plane stabilised and decent traverse rate, definitly too good for 8.0, ammunition is a limiting factor but 400mm Penetration HEAT-FS is still absolutely fine for 8.3
FV4030/3
Ground RB
9.7 → 9.7
Remove the L23 APFSDS, with the Rapier moving to 9.7 a decent lineup is forming at the BR (FV4030/3, Rooikat 105, Harrier GR3, Rapier) but by moving it up the FV4030/3 you stifle that lineup. Although I can see the FV4030/3 is quite effective, so I propose removing APFSDS, leaving it with the L15 APDS and HESH, this would limit its capability in frontal engagements at range, and at close range leave more of a chance for counter play as L15 cannot reliably front penetrate T-64B, T72M1, ZTZ96 etc without aiming for weakspots, essentially turning it into something akin to a Churchill gameplay wise, good armour with a poor gun. (Not trying to say L15 is bad however, it would fairly reliably deal with every else with a decent aim.)
I did have another idea which I’ll elaborate on in another post
5 Likes