I think another reason the ZT3A2 is at that br is because if you run into anything at close range, or run into anything while moving, or reloading, or if your gunner scratches his nose while a tank comes into view youre dead. Its not responsive enough to deal with enemies, you have to literally sit somewhere, hidden, and do absolutely nothing until someone drives in your LOS and you better pray they dont have a stabiliser, a faster shell and eyes to engage you before your missle makes it to the targer.
If the ratel 20 got apds might be fine to move up, still a bus though.
If the Finnish F-18C were truly as superior as claimed, its in-game presence or social media coverage (like F-18C videos) would not lag so far behind the American F/A-18C Late. The reality is that there is virtually no interest in discussing this “superior” F-18C, making it completely subpar for Swedish players who have long awaited new aircraft in the tech tree.
On another note, I do not believe the lack of a helmet-mounted sight (HMCS) can be equated to the minor weight reduction. The impact of weight or drag differences could easily be offset by external fuel tanks or adjusting fuel load, but the absence of HMCS creates a persistent, game-long disadvantage that cannot be compensated for by other means.
yes, but you can really deal with it even in 7.7, id say this is gaijin’s fault for giving 8.7 full downtiers almost every match, and should not blame 8.7 vehicles. t55s already kinda struggle in uptiers, being faced with much better opponents in terms of armour mobility and firepower, and making it 9.0 will really make it suck. They should instead fix the matchmaking, making it less prone to downtiers.
Reasoning: At 12.7, all other aircraft with vastly superior flight performance, such as Mirage 2000, F-16, and MiG-29 feature the same battle rating with all aspect heatseeking missiles, and in some cases even IRCCM all aspect heatseeking missiles. Even at 12.3, we see aircraft like the F-16A with AIM-9Ls. The AIM-54 is too good to justify a reduction in BR to 12.3, however, this aircraft struggles at 12.7 with its RWR and extremely lackluster AIM-9Hs for 12.7. AIM-9Ls would be a good way to balance this airplane without compressing BRs.
You mean the planes with great survivability and 4 ARHs that pull 40G? Those planes? I’d rather be a very nimble R-Darter slinger than watch my lumbering Fakours miss a target doing a barrelroll.
Yeah but that’s a wrong use of the stats just like Gaijin is doing. It’s not because I have a brain that i’m better than a Tiger in any way.
The gun has no HE filler, even though it has good pen, and takes ages to aim as opposed to the said Tiger.
I already need to drive carefully, adjust my accelerations and braking while always listening to engines nearby… PLAYERS may be good, bu the tank is decent at most at its BR
The only good thing here is finally moving air grb to 13.0, everything else is completely useless… moving kurnass 2000 to 12.3 is stupid yet leaving the type 90 tanks at 11.3, they should have been moved to 11.7.
if you think like this then why not just nerf every soviet vehicle? they all out armour most tanks at their br, in fact they are even more agile, yet no one complained about them.
Sorry, but I did not list any vehicle stats…
Do you want that?
The gun is fully compareable as is the post pen damage. if you want top see bad AP damage play the UK. A Uk 90mm AP shell deals less than 20% of the AMX M4s shells damage.
Again the AMX M4 is better than a Tiger II both in stats as well as in performance
Im sorry but thats a skill issue on your end then, i have a good KD at 13.0 in my IRIAF and to call it the worst 13.0 is because people can’t accept the fact it can’t sealclub nearly as easily as it once could.
Reasoning: At 13.0 battle rating, aircraft such as the F-15A, Su-27, MiG-29G, all feature all-aspect, IRCCM heatseeking missiles on superior airframes than the F-14B. I understand the justification for the battle rating is the F-14B’s possession of Fox-3 AIM-54 Phoenixes and technical improvements over the F-14A Early model, however, aircraft such as the F-4F at 13.0 also feature far better performing Fox-3s than the AIM-54 with IRCCM heatseeking missiles as well.
The AIM-9M was historically used on the F-14B, and the F-14B is also a much newer, more modern aircraft than some aircraft that also feature AIM-9Ms currently in the game, such as the F-15A. Additionally, the new AIM-7P was also used on the F-14B, and although this would add only a slight improvement over the M model, it would further make this aircraft worth using over the superior F-15A and Su-27 airframes, to name a few examples.
This! When stock grinding the A-10C, I had so many matches that ended before I even saw a single enemy, it takes over 5-6 minutes to reach map center. It needs air spawn so bad. Really don’t know what is keeping Gaijin from doing it, the mechanic is already in the game and used by lower tier planes.