Planned Battle Rating changes for April 2024

Official News, Development Blogs and Updates
675

new max BR is needed, badly. compression complicates balance updates like this far too much to ignore

5 Likes
676

The sagittario is now an entire 1.3 WHOLE ASS BRS ABOVE THE MIG15 its literally unplayable at its current br and should be moved down to 9.0 or 8.7

2 Likes
677

M4A1 (FL10) → PCOT-51P
EBR 1954 → PCOT-51P
AMX-50 (TO90/930) → HEAT-FS = M431 (The same as the M47 Patton)
Char 25t → HEAT-FS = M431 (The same as the M47 Patton)

Arcade :
M26 → 6.3
Object 906 → 8.3
AMX-30 DCA → 8.3
AMX-13 (FL 11) → 3.7

10 Likes
678

One issue there. You cant insta swap. and HESH does nothing with even a slight amount of armour So its either be ready to fight 2s38s or ready to fight literally anything else

679

I think the point of lowering the Falcon is that there is no point to use the Falcon as SPAA at that BR due to 2x SPAA with radar at the same BR.

2 Likes
680

I just checked the Russian forum. The difference is that they have added requirement for each player to say BR change for a single vehicle. They said that big comments might not get reviewed. They are making some sort of statistics out of the comments.

Nothing like that was mentioned in the English forum so are they really reviewing what we say here? That’s the question

1 Like
681

Thank you for now making the AMX completely useless now as it h has no line up at 10.7 and will be uptiered to Pansirs and TORs. Very cool gaijin

1 Like
682

probably not. I have heard that when it comes to BR changes, they only look at the russian forums.

683

However on ru forum you can suggest only ONE vehicle, while there - unlimited suggestions.

684

That’s saddening… They will never demand BR change of 292 or 2s38. Only strela was mentioned

1 Like
685

M18 at 6.0!?

1 Like
686

But does that mean they just dont look at the english forums though and thus it doesnt matter how many people call for changed

687

Please tell me that the russian forums are demanding that the Hellcats stay at 5.7. I really don’t see them work at 6.0 given what they’ll have to face

2 Likes
688

Who said you that?

689

I have no idea, but it does explain why most Soviet stuff is under-BRed

2 Likes
690

Maybe I will tell you a secret, but english speaking audience is more hearable by devs since it donates more.

3 Likes
691

Amx should NOT go to 10.7… What about the lineup for 10.3? Italy at high and top tier is so depressing. This means that the AMX can go up against the AV8B+ and the J8F, which are much better aircraft. You also have to consider that it is a SUB-SONIC aircraft. It needs to stay at 10.3.

5 Likes
692
17 Likes
693

Here is a link for the Russian forum:

Post what you want like this and it will be ok:

RB 2s38 10.0 > 10.7

Maybe our voices will be heard there at least

6 Likes
694

Gaijin you should keep mig15/mig17/sabre at their br(unless CL13MK5/6 and J-5 and meybe F86F-2)
if you really want to drop their br,you forget G.91pre(8.0),G91R1(8.3),G91Y and YS(9.0),sagittario2(9.0),vampire(7.7 or 7.3),venom FB(8.3 or 8.0),hunter F1 and J34(8.7),hunter F6 (9.3),spitfire MK24(6.7),meteor F3(7.0),F86K(8.7)maybe,MD.450/452/454 should also drop 0.3 br,R2Y2 to 7.7 or 7.3,yak-23 and yak30d to 8.3 or below,F9F/F2H,F84F,french vautour,J32B,seahawk(britain),ki200 and me163(both B and B-0)
ALL of them need to drop a BR(some of them even don’t need to change mig15/17/sabre’s br and they should also reduce some BR)
For naval,please move the goddamn SKRs to 4.7 or 5.0,now!And cancel BR change of Folago/M-17/M-802

5 Likes