Brexithunder
8 Likes
Im amazed when two vehicles that are at the same br are objectively better/worse. The best example is the a21a vs a21c. Why the hell would anyone play the a21a if its the exact same plane at the exact same br but slower and without ground attack munitions?
I don’t think the AMX 30 DCA should go to 8.3 if gepard and falcon are not moving, it’s more a less the same.
Also i would suggest lowering the FCM 2C (from 2.3 to 2.0 at least), it suffer very high in a uptier and this 0.3 reduction could help it a little
9 Likes
F-5E at 10.7 with 4 mavericks, 2x aim-9Js and a much much better flight performance.
The only good change I’m seeing is the F-86F-2 being pulled out of the 10.0 matchmaker and the Strela going further up, albeit minimally.
Why can’t we just decompress instead of downtiering vehicles that suffer??
3 Likes
I kinda get it, but also kinda don’t, why move the M18 up to 6.0? It’s not the improved engine power, as in that case the Black Cat would stay at 5.7. And while I agree that it’s a good tank, i for my part don’t really feel that the M18s are 6.0 good. Especially as the only other vehicle that you can form a 6.0 lineup with is the M4 T26.
I mean, at the end of the day the decision is well and truly out of my hand and I don’t expect this to b ereversed, but I’d like to know why it’s being moved up. I don’ see that thing being 6.0 good.
2 Likes
Not surprised to see the Fox moved up. Now how about some proper BR decompression?
Have you considered BR decompressions instead of whatever this is.
Also give America some SPAA already the M42’s and M19s being constantly lowered in BR and America not being given anything new for years is just criminal at this point.
The issue is the stupid forward mobility and acceleration it gets as well as having T-80U armour a whole 1.3br lower combine that with a small map and you can just blitz around corners one shotting with the massively overperforming spall that 3BM42 gets while people generally panic shoot non penning which against a T-72 at point blank would usually go through
1 Like
I like how the Japanese Sabre going to 8.3, can now soon add it to my 8.3 line up for Ground RB. No longer have to rely on my R2Y2s there.
Not at all.
The French Roland 1 has terrible elevation that heavily limits it’s ability to engage high flying aircraft, along with completely lacking the track radar present on the other roland platforms.
The 9.3 SANTAL is just a better SPAA at this point considering it’s extremely good vertical guidance, thermals, and 6 ready to fire MISTRAL MANPADS that can be fired back to back without having to sit through a restrictive reload animation after firing 2 missiles.
1 Like
With all of the other high tier subsonics moving down it makes no sense that britain is still stuck with such overtiered vehicles these changes as is will only makes things worse so they either need to be not implemented or britain should also have a majority of their rank 5 and 6 aircraft move down
Vampire FB.5 from 8.0 to 7.7 its already one of the worst starter jets and it doesnt help that it shares a br with better variants of itself in non british techtrees
Venom FB.4 from 8.7 to 8.0 again its strictly inferior to its contemporaries and will soon be a higher br than them such as the sabres and mig-15 it should not be the same br as the CL-13A mk.5
Hunter f.1 from 9.0 to 8.7 this used to always be the equal to the CL-13A mk.5 it makes no sense that it should sit higher than it in br
Scimitar F mk.1 from 8.7 to 8.3 the scimitar has an extremely rigid playstyle that forces it to BNZ only especially due to the horrible rudder which makes it feel like a ho229 in its accuracy. At its current br its almost impossible for it to make use of its sole advantage in acceleration when it will soon be forced to contest with even more aircraft at an even closer BR to itself capable of keeping up with it that also have the ability to turn faster than a brick
3 Likes
I dont disagree with you but holy run-on sentences batman
Yeah i cant be asked its a forum post on an informal site its not exactly an english exam im too tired to punctuate it properly anyway
Why is the T-34E STZ going to 4.3? It was fine at 4.0 and the 15mm of additional armour didn’t really change anything regarding how it’s played.
And why is the event amd still at 1.7 while being worse than the tech tree one?
3 Likes
Gaijin:
“These are good ideas, but poor grammar so wont be implemented.”
5 Likes
Given the movement of the Sabres/MiGs, please also address the following:
Venom FB.4 > 8.3
Hunter F.1 > 8.7
Hunter F.6 > 9.3
R2Y2 (all) >7.7
M.D.452 IIC > 8.0
Mystere IVA > 8.3
J29F > 8.7
EDIT: Also a very good case could be made for Yak 30D to 8.3 as well, but should probably be Rank 5 then.
I’ve been spading a lot of Rank 5/6 jets across nations lately and almost everything I’ve been playing at 7.7 has been rather fun. Unfortunately they’re now going to get dumpstered by the MiGs/Sabres.
6 Likes
lol they cant complain much given the state of their devblogs half the time.
1 Like
Yeah that is true :D
1 Like
MiG-15bis ISH should have stayed at 8.3 IMO. It has an almost identical FM to the normal MiG-15bis and more + better CAS options. It being able to fight F3Ds, A2D-1s, etc, is straight up unfair.
2 Likes