Planned Battle Rating changes for April 2024

I’m sorry, but the 2S38 is pretty much on par with the HSTV-L, but with lesser mobility and way better anti air coverage. I do not agree that it should be 11.3 (As others say), but I do agree that it should be 10.7 with how much it’s APFSDS shell pens and how fast it fires. The fuel tank tanking all shots is a factor as well.

3 Likes

The 76 Sheridan going up to 7.0 and the Fox going up to 7.7/Rank V are good changes. 7.7 is a good BR for the Fox, I hope it doesn’t it moved higher than that because it will just encounter more and more lightly armored vehicles as it goes up and it will be a spiral of continuous nerfs that don’t fix the problem.

The M18 and it’s derivatives do not deserve to be moved to 6.0, even with the horsepower buff.

6 Likes

Air RB: Instead of moving 8.3-9.3 down, maybe you should move 9.0-10.0 up?!?!??!?!?

2 Likes

It has a lot more than 1mm of penetration, it’s over 220mm’s actually. It’s definitely almost on par wit the HSTV-L, so I think 10.7 would be way better than 10.0 as it lolpens a ton of vehicles at 10.0.

2 Likes

M4K is the 2nd best jet in the game, so I hard disagree with that one.
And M2K5F is the 2nd best 12.3.
FG1 with 9Ls would be 11.7 or moving EJ Kai to 11.3.

But it doesnt have HMD :P

Ground(well, people will know what im gonna explain anyways)

Breda truck 3.7
Churchill NA75 4.0
Comet I 5.0
Centurion Mk.2 6.3
M109G IDF 5.7
PLZ83 6.0
M109A1 USGF/RA 6.0
Merkava Mk.2D 9.3/M426
Obj292 10.3/10.7 arcade
T-80UD 10.7 with 3BM46 and 9M119M1
C1 ariete PSO/WAR 10.7 without DM53
OTOMATIC 10.7 with unlimited APFSDS
VT-4A1 11.3
Leclerc S1/S2 11.3
Leclerc SXXI/AZUR with DM53

6 Likes

Where is the Venom on this list? How can it still be 8.7?!?! Should be 8.0 with the MiG-15 and Bis ISH

4 Likes

I feel like they just forgot Britain exists

6 Likes

Brexithunder

8 Likes

Im amazed when two vehicles that are at the same br are objectively better/worse. The best example is the a21a vs a21c. Why the hell would anyone play the a21a if its the exact same plane at the exact same br but slower and without ground attack munitions?

I don’t think the AMX 30 DCA should go to 8.3 if gepard and falcon are not moving, it’s more a less the same.

Also i would suggest lowering the FCM 2C (from 2.3 to 2.0 at least), it suffer very high in a uptier and this 0.3 reduction could help it a little

9 Likes

F-5E at 10.7 with 4 mavericks, 2x aim-9Js and a much much better flight performance.

The only good change I’m seeing is the F-86F-2 being pulled out of the 10.0 matchmaker and the Strela going further up, albeit minimally.

Why can’t we just decompress instead of downtiering vehicles that suffer??

3 Likes

I kinda get it, but also kinda don’t, why move the M18 up to 6.0? It’s not the improved engine power, as in that case the Black Cat would stay at 5.7. And while I agree that it’s a good tank, i for my part don’t really feel that the M18s are 6.0 good. Especially as the only other vehicle that you can form a 6.0 lineup with is the M4 T26.

I mean, at the end of the day the decision is well and truly out of my hand and I don’t expect this to b ereversed, but I’d like to know why it’s being moved up. I don’ see that thing being 6.0 good.

2 Likes

Not surprised to see the Fox moved up. Now how about some proper BR decompression?

Have you considered BR decompressions instead of whatever this is.

Also give America some SPAA already the M42’s and M19s being constantly lowered in BR and America not being given anything new for years is just criminal at this point.

The issue is the stupid forward mobility and acceleration it gets as well as having T-80U armour a whole 1.3br lower combine that with a small map and you can just blitz around corners one shotting with the massively overperforming spall that 3BM42 gets while people generally panic shoot non penning which against a T-72 at point blank would usually go through

1 Like

I like how the Japanese Sabre going to 8.3, can now soon add it to my 8.3 line up for Ground RB. No longer have to rely on my R2Y2s there.

Not at all.

The French Roland 1 has terrible elevation that heavily limits it’s ability to engage high flying aircraft, along with completely lacking the track radar present on the other roland platforms.

The 9.3 SANTAL is just a better SPAA at this point considering it’s extremely good vertical guidance, thermals, and 6 ready to fire MISTRAL MANPADS that can be fired back to back without having to sit through a restrictive reload animation after firing 2 missiles.

1 Like