I was speaking in general. There are plenty of meta event vehicles in game.
1 Like
congrats, you’ve found out about decompression.
Now apply this idea to every other BR in game.
Maybe then we’ll have some semblance of balance
1 Like
Falcon 8.3 → 7.7 Ground RB
APDS has been removed the radar is mediocre and the shell that does any damage to tanks is only 53 ish mm at point blank compared to the other 35mm on the other spaa at 8.3, plus at 7.7 it will face more heavily armoured vehicles and balance it. It is also quite slow and has no armour.
Brittain Desperately need an Spaa at 7.7 having 3 spaa at 8.3 to 8.7 is crazy. I would say it’s no better than the Russian ones at 7.7 or have the pen that the flakpanzer has at 7.0 with the recent changes.
13 Likes
Fair enough
Aircraft:
F/A-18C Late
Mode:
Air RB
Proposed change:
14.0 > 13.7
It’s a side grade to the F-16C in which you get more missiles by completely throwing away it’s flight performance, it should not bet above the F-15C/Su-27SM/J-11B which do everything better and have similar missile amount.
Aircraft:
F-16CM PoBIT
Mode:
Air RB
Proposed change:
14.3 > 14.0
It’s an F-16C with an AESA radar, the improvement in capabilities is nowhere near enough for it to justify 2 step difference in BR, the AIM-120D and C-5 are in some cases just downgrades of the A/B models.
You can’t carry the MAWS pylon with missiles either.
Aircraft:
F/A-18E
Mode:
Air RB
Proposed change:
14.3 > 14.0
The Superbug is just as before the side grade of the F-16CM with more missiles countered by throwing away all performance which even as terrible as bad as it is now it’s still wildly overperforming.
Neither the F-16CM and F/A-18E are equals to the F-15C GE which just straight up fixes all the problems both those aircraft have at the same BR.
Aircraft:
J-15T
Mode:
Air RB
Proposed change:
14.7 > 14.3
It’s not an equal to the SM2, it’s a normal SM with barely no countermeasures and 2 less missiles for better engines.
The MKM at 14.3 get’s a MAW something the SM2 doesn’t even have
Lack of countermeasures makes it incapable of staying in the fight, when 98 don’t get you very far right now 48 is nothing.
6 Likes
AIM-120Ds are the worst ARH avalible at top tier being barely harder to dodge versions of C-5s, which are barely faster Bs, which are copy pasted As
The GEs engines are horribly underpowered for the BR
The radar is a sad excuse next to the EF2k, rafale, and SM2
The airframe is also miserable compared to the three aformentioned aircraft
The only benefit it a slightly higher missile count, and a infinite pit of CMs
1 Like
yea well…
it’s an SPAA.
M13/40 (I)
it_m13_40_serie_1
-
Arcade Battle BR: 1.7 → 1.3
-
Realistic Battle BR: 1.7 → 1.3
-
8 mm Breda mod.38 Reload Speed: 8.0 s → 3.5 s
-
Add Granata mod.35 (HE)
Rationale:
Most other nations get their first medium tanks at 1.3. The M13/40 (I) is already overall worse than the Pz.III F [BR 1.3] in almost every regard aside from post-pen damage and turret armor. The mobility is on the slower side, and the gun is fairly underwhelming in all regards except damage. I don’t see why it wouldn’t be fine at the same BR as the likes of the D2 or Pz.IV C.
17 Likes
Ah I see, wasn’t sure if it shared the same fate as the R-27s.
Aircraft:
J6K1
Mode:
Air RB
Proposed Change:
6.7 → 6.3 or 6.0
Reason:
While the J6K1 has very strong armament with six 20 mm cannons and additional machine guns, its actual flight performance does not justify a 6.7 BR. The aircraft has decent engine power on paper, but in practice its climb rate is mediocre for the tier and it struggles to gain altitude quickly compared to its competition.
At 6.7, it frequently faces aircraft like the P-51H Mustang and Spitfire variants that outperform it in key areas such as climb, speed, and energy retention. These aircraft can control engagements much more effectively, leaving the J6K1 at a disadvantage in most situations.
Although its firepower is strong, that alone is not enough to compensate for its lack of competitive flight performance. Lowering it to 6.3 or 6.0 would place it in a more appropriate bracket where it can better utilize its strengths without being consistently outperformed by higher-performance fighters.
1 Like
Arguement to move the F-15C GE up.
Not the other two down.
The PoBit at 14.0 could be viable though, but the F-18E and the F that you failed to mention are more than capable at 14.3
1 Like
Vehicle: BM oplot-t/m
Br: 12.3->12.0
Reason: weak armor and bad vertical targeting speed
7 Likes
BMPT2 and BMPT need move to 13.0!!!
4 Likes
puma too
One vehicle per post.
F-18E is fine at 14.3
F-16CM PooBIT is not
2 Likes
M13/40 (II) & (III)
it_m13_40_serie_2
it_m13_40_serie_3
-
Arcade Battle BR: 2.0 → 1.7
-
Realistic Battle BR: 2.0 → 1.7
-
47 mm 47/32 mod.35 Reload Speed: 2.9 s → 3.1 s
-
8 mm Breda mod.38 Reload Speed: 8.0 s → 3.5 s
-
Add Granata mod.35 (HE)
Rationale:
These two vehicles are functionally identical, and only a slight step up from the M13/40 (I), so they have similar rationale for a BR change as the earlier M13/40 (I). They are still slow and have poor penetration, with the only improvement being a bit better RoF and gun depression.
I propose a very slight reload nerf because a combination of high post-pen damage and fire rate could make them a bit too proficient for seal clubbing. 3.1 seconds is still very fast, but gives 37 mm armed vehicles a better fighting chance.
17 Likes
Hey, I’m so happy that the BMPT are getting nerfed !!
Would it be possible to buff just a little bit the A-7E Corsair II (US and JPN)? (like moving them to 10.3 for ground realistic battle) ?
Can we see in the far (or close) futur some 10.0 → 11.0 tanks for japan because we have nothing to play with the A-7E and Alpha Jet TH ?
no
1 Like
Aircraft:
Mirage 2000C-S4
Mode:
Air RB
Proposed change:
12.3 > 12.0
This aircraft is essentially M200C-S5 without MAW and SPIRALE chaff countermeasures system, thus inferior to S5. There is no reason to both be at same battlerating. Either give it the missing modifications or drop the BR of it to 12.0
3 Likes
Japan doesn’t even have a 10.3 lineup dawg