Planned Battle Rating Changes (April 2026)

Imo its nitpicking. Namer has better protection and APS, Freccia has much larger ATGM magazine etc…

yeah fair enough

Vehicle: Mirage 2000C-S5

Gamemode: Realistic

BR Change: 12.7 → 12.7

Reason :
It has literally has the best statistics in the Rank 8, according to statshark.
It has the highest Kill/Death and Kill/Spawn among all rank 8 planes.
It’s the last jet that should go down to 12.3.

1 Like

nope, the 8 inch slingers should not be going down in BR with how compressed 6.0-7.0 is, there should be heavy decompression at the top by at least 2.0 br jumps considering the gulf between even early ww1 bbs and many 6 inch CLs, but if/when that happens the des moines and newport news should stay 6.7 and not go down to the same br as helena, brooklynn, pittsburgh, roanoke when they’re a lot more damaging

I think moving up the BMPT’s in BR is worthless. They already perform too well even in top tier. They just ruin less matchmaking this way…

There are two options to make it balanced.

  • The accuracy of the autocannons get lowered.

  • Remove the bs APDS belt and place back to its original BR.

1 Like

Vehicle: A6M5 Ko

Gamemode: Air RB

BR Change: 5.3 → 5.0-5.3

Reason: You cannot increase these planes in BR without knowing the context. It’s likely that they have solid stat cards, but it is not because they are overperforming, but rather because most people do not know how to play against them. However the moment you face somebody half decent A6M becomes hopeless because it lacks meaningful speed to go offensive. It currently shares BR with P-38K overall, a far more capable plane and you want to further push it to 5.7 where it will face superprops like Yak-3U which are leagues ahead. Ps: this applies also to A6M5, A6M5 otsu A6M6 etc…

2 Likes

Vehicle : La combattante
Mode : Naval RB
Change : 3.7 → 3.3
Reasoning : The vehicule’s main advantage compared to its predecessor VLT-1, which sits at 3.3, is a SS-11 missile launcher. This advantage however is held back by poor survivability, a lack of torpedoes contrary to VLT-1 and a maximum speed basically cut in half. The missile warhead (2KG TNT, heat) is also far too situational and does too little post pen damage to matter, while its max range (3.5 km) limits its use to close quarters

2 Likes

Bro, Im begging you to reduce BR of F2A ADTW. Its so frustating to keep facing Su30 with 10 good missiles or 10 fox 3 coming at you.

No
the F-2 is one of the best 13.0 aircraft
The better solution is bringing the Su-30s UP

1 Like

Compression issue i think, but it sitting at the same br as F15A, Mig29 or F-14 all planes having 1.5x to 2x the quantity of missiles, and dare i say better ones in the fox1 department (or fox3 in case of f-14) was quite an anomaly

M2ks saving grace was the 2 magic 2s and a solid FM, all the rest (quantity of missiles, S530D, radar) is quite subpar.

It now goes to a br with f18a (more and better missile but weaker FM) and f16a (better FM but weaker missile load), which seems reasonable although decompression is of course still needed

I dont care bro. Whatever the solution is, but right now, F2A ADTW is miserable to play with missile spam from Su30 and FOX 3. I notched 4 missiles but guess what? They still had 6 MORE MISSILES.

I strongly agree with this

1 Like

Plus their missiles are capable to launch at 90 degrees angle and still hit you accurately while my fox 2 need to stay locked on to hit them.

Yeah no it doesn’t need to go lower. The SAP is the good round especially as a TD even without APDS its BR is still fine and can kill air and tanks just as easy as it did with APDS.

moving the F-2 lower literally will not change the situation. you’re just making it worse for everyone

2 Likes

you mean Fox-1…

yeah mb. but told you. idc what the solution is. i just think its completely not fair to meet su30 every game i played. raising su30 br will not solve the problem because its almost 13.7 game everytime i played japan. meanwhile when i play F14 IRIAF I always got a downtier.

what about the mirageF1C and F1C-200? Compare with the F1CT, they do not have the advance RWR. I think they can not share the same BR in ARB. Maybe F1C and F1C-200 need some adjustment.

1 Like

the Su-30 is absolutely not in a fair position rn, it is way undertiered

you clearly dont have the slightest clue what youre talking about and it blatantly shows.

None of those missiles will do anything if their radar is useless (which is the case for all of those early planes, so adding a better missile wont do crap most of the time)
and the F3H has pictures of it trailing Aim7Fs Let alone the 7D i asked for.
the 7D has a slightly longer burn than the 7C which is imporant cuz they C burns all of its fuel before it even starts guiding.

And the 7E has a better motor than the 7D which makes it go faster and would help the struggle bus F4C that doesnt even get flares. its one of the rare planes that doesnt get CMs above 9.3, so it should get SOMETHING.

also the XM800T is not .50 cal proof, its not even 30 cal proof.
it has NO LRF, or thermal, again ALL stuff a vehicle nearly 2.0 BR less than it has. and the weasel is just as fast and annoying. in addition to being small and able to hide. the big american shed is not sneaky at all.

Stryker is also useless and only has 30mm, no ATGms but we have IFVs with ATGMs and auto cannons with the same pen down at 8.3 so 8.7 is fine

also i was talking about AIR BRs for aircraft, those not ground, so idk why you brought up any of that, totally clueless yet again.

9L and R60M doesnt do anything and always goes for flares (or rockets/missiles be fired), and most planes at those BRs all have CMs anyway.
But you would know that if you actually knew what you were talking about, and weren’t busy trying to do the worlds worst attempt at gas lighting, combined with the most wildly unhinged from reality strawman.

as for the F18C early, again that was the whole point of the C, its suppose to have the improved radar, the engines, the Cms, and the aim120s. we have a FAKE plane that didnt exist with a loadout and equipment that doesnt exist

god forbid the US compete with russian bias, or have ammo from the decade/century these vehicles actually existed in and used, we cant have that.