Planned Battle Rating Changes (April 2026)

Official News, Development Blogs and Updates
2443

you clearly dont have the slightest clue what youre talking about and it blatantly shows.

None of those missiles will do anything if their radar is useless (which is the case for all of those early planes, so adding a better missile wont do crap most of the time)
and the F3H has pictures of it trailing Aim7Fs Let alone the 7D i asked for.
the 7D has a slightly longer burn than the 7C which is imporant cuz they C burns all of its fuel before it even starts guiding.

And the 7E has a better motor than the 7D which makes it go faster and would help the struggle bus F4C that doesnt even get flares. its one of the rare planes that doesnt get CMs above 9.3, so it should get SOMETHING.

also the XM800T is not .50 cal proof, its not even 30 cal proof.
it has NO LRF, or thermal. again ALL stuff a vehicle nearly 2.0 BR less than it has with the exact same gun and ammo. and the weasel is just as fast and annoying.
in addition to being small and able to hide. where as the big american shed, is not sneaky at all.

The Stryker & EFV is also useless and only has 30mm, no ATGms but we have IFVs with ATGMs and auto cannons with the same pen down at 8.3 so 8.7 is fine they also get killed by .30 cal MG fire. they 10000% shouldnt but gaijin thinks american vehicles are heavy and made out of soda cans that bb guns can penetrate.

also i was talking about AIR BRs for aircraft, those not ground. so idk why you brought up any of that, totally clueless yet again.

9L and R60M doesn’t do anything and always goes for flares (or rockets/missiles being fired), and most planes at those BRs all have CMs anyway.
But you would know that if you actually knew what you were talking about, and weren’t busy trying to do the worlds worst attempt at gas lighting, combined with the most wildly unhinged from reality strawman.

as for the F18C early, again that was the whole point of the C, its suppose to have the improved radar, the engines, the Cms, and the aim120s. we have a FAKE plane that didnt exist with a loadout and equipment that doesnt exist

god forbid the US compete with russian bias, or have ammo from the decade/century these vehicles actually existed in and used, we cant have that.

1 Like
2444

More premium Fox-3 carriers is not healthy for the game.
Despite it not having Fox-3s it’s still one of the best 12.7 planes. If you think the radar and CMs are incorrect go find the necessary docs and bug report it

2445

we do all the time, gaijin doesnt give a single care in the world.
we Constantly report incorrect pen, weapon loadouts, armor values, mass and thrust values, wrong motor types with regards to smokeless or reduced smoke weapons, or burn times, or incorrect mass. like PAINFULLY OBVIOUS ARTIFICIALLY HIGH INCORRECT MASS throwing off the velocity of weapons.

and gajin doesnt care cuz its not russian.

1 Like
2446

riight, surely Russia NEVER suffers from this either.

cough cough fulcrum’s R-73s cough cough

1 Like
2447

Bug report has been made, well at least for BOLS pods missing on American legacy hornets. However like most bug reports it has not been fixed

2448

Any estimate on when this goes into action? 5 matches in a row at 10.3 all full uptiers against Russia, with Russia having x4 more people queuing than everyone else combined due to a certain ground vehicle…

2449

So, now we wait. Just like everybody else.

Still waiting on MiG-29M cm fix myself

2450

dude gaijin flat out admits they did some things by mistake, and STILL doesnt fix them 5 years later. and then doubles down on spreading the mistake/false info
like with the 105 and 120mm nato pen nerfs
setting APKWS mass too high,
setting US dart mass and length to low.
using weapons from the wrong era on aircraft and tanks… granted some of that is just old abandon-ware vehicles. but still.

so yeah anyone saying “go provide documents” is either disingenuous af or has no clue what kinda company they are dealing with.

like how do you get worse than
submits proof…
…yep we made a mistake
are you going to fix it?..
…Lmao, no.

1 Like
2451

Anybody who argues this would be delusional.

This is some top tier US main delusion, what are you smoking?

Almost every nation has a 40-50% winrate at that BR, and the US mains being major nation mains are usually pretty mediocre/bad doesn’t help.

This doesn’t change what I said, anyone doing bad in the 12.0 Abrams should be restricted from playing this game. However Gaijin would lose a lot of players so that is never happening.

1 Like
2452

BMPT will still be broken at 11.7. Good luck selling 10.7 premiums. It should be 12.0 like everybody has been saying since you put the thing in the game. But you never listen to the community so idk why I’m wasting my time here.

3 Likes
2453

it would still be cracked at 12.7 the thing is damn near unkillable and has god missiles… + abrams tanks are regularly killed by 20mm let alone 30s.

1 Like
2454

Is there a reason the La-9 is absent from this list?
Those are part of the ‘turn fighter’ meta airplanes, why are those not being moved up to 6.3?

2455

Almost any tank will die to 20mm and 30mm (Maybe except for BVM, 90M, Merkava, Leo 2a7v and strv 122). The reason why Abrams feels so easy to kill is due to the turret ring which is modeled wrong. Bug report has been accepted almost 3 or 2 years ago, but still not fixed like most bug reports :(

2456

Current US 6.3 cruisers should be moved back to 6.0, I am to lazy to report each of them and forum rules doesnt allow to report them in a bunch. The difference is altrough inferior, all 5.7+ cruisers can kill Des Moines, while Des Moines cannot leave a dent to 6.7+ capital ships.

Decompression would be great but knowing Gaijin I wont be surprised to eventually see dreadnoughts at 5.0

2457

Nah that would mean gaijin not nerfing minor nation vehicles that are already bad, if it was actualy used it would require more effort than checking if the vehicle is from a minor nation or a premium

2458

Aircraft:
J-15T

Mode:
Air RB

Proposed change:
14.7 > 14.3

Reasoning:

The J-15T is at a very large disadvantage compared to other 14.7. with PL-12A being the same kinematically as PL-12, Radar not being 100°+ to keep with the SU30SM2 and others, and much worse high altitude perf than all 14.7.

The J-15T has ended up being just a higher tier J-11B with worse fm, new engine, and new radar. There is no reason it should be 14.7

Edit: I’d also like to add that the F-15C GE is at 14.3 while be widely more capable than the J-15T

5 Likes
2459

Why are you bringing the ‘air arcade’ result for the Nerf MiG-25PD in ‘all modes’?

2460

what makes you think that the centauro 2 needs to be moved up? what makes it better than anything else at a lower br? or is this just another minor nation tank nerf just because its a minor nation.

2461

2S38 10.7 → 10.3

It got carried along the BMPT, it should sit at 10.3 where it belongs, only because it alongside BMPTs it doesn’t mean it’s anyway strong.

1 Like
2462

what? the missiles are bad, the radar is the worst and you want it to face 12.7 aircraft?