Planned Battle Rating Changes (April 2026)

Almost forgot about this one…

A6M6c 5.0 → 4.7

It is a heavier and slower A6M5, losing the only advantage A6s have. The extra cannon barely makes a difference as you can’t even get your guns on target

2 Likes

Vehicle: Schützenpanzer PUMA

Mode: RB

Change: 10.3 → 10.0

Reason: since we now have more vehicles which feature similar armament as the Puma (Only a 30mm with 200 RPM) its time to move it to a BR were it makes atleast half sense…

Dragoon: 9.7 (30mm)
PUMA: 10.3 (30mm)
BMD-4M2: 9.7 (30mm @ 330RPM)/HE/ATGM Launcher)
Typ 24 ICV(P)/RCV(P): 9.7/9.7 (30mm)
ZBD04A: 10.0 (30mm/HE/ATGM Launcher)

7 Likes

It is still too survivable to be just .3 over the VBCI, the VJTF should be 10.7 tho

Also at 9.3 too

Well, all you need to kill it is a single 23mm HE round
Insert: funny bug…
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/e5kP56666PW6

1 Like

How did they mess up the overpressure triggers again 😭😭😭 (Eitan used to get overpressured from the suspension hitbox, not sure if it’s fixed anymore but it is very common in light tanks either way)

Should it? CV90 MK.IV is 10.7 with better mobility and 2 more spikes for worse armor worse gun pen (the 9.3 30mm trashmaster.) with no anti air ammo or anti air tracking

That thing should be like 10.0 but sweden tax

Sweden tax doesn’t exist they are OP at every BR as I’ve been told countless times it’s just Sweden cope they have nothing bad.

BILL, T-55M, Elde, BMP-2, even the lvkv since it doesnt get m/01
They could all go .3 down and be fine

Don’t mention the Elde I’ve had people tell me it’s OP and under tiered at 12.0 the others don’t matter cause that’s cope to think they suffer in any regard.

Real not which BILL lmao there’s 2 for now

1 Like

Elde suffers from strela syndrome where it’s insane within a short range but you can just stay outside of it

Also the 9040 BILL, even though it’d be funny to see the other one at a lower BR, I would not want to see it in a kingtiger

av8b (NA), harrier T.10
air RB
11.3 ->11.0
reasoning, 4 9Ls on a subsonic airframe, at 11.3 is not good, specially considering other aircraft from the same br range

2 Likes

(no mention of the Elde mobility, oh how precious you are to not have to use such a vehicle. Seriously I wouldn’t wish that thing on my greatest enemy)

Mobility

Also the PBV BILL is 8.7 it wouldn’t see a tiger right?

1 Like

Being at a higher br than the av8s is so weird

1 Like

If it got moved down it could

Sea Harrier FRS.1/Sea Harrier FRS.1 (e)
air RB

11.0 → 10.7
10.7 → 10.3

again, subsonic aircraft with 9Ls however they are a gen 1 harrier airframe which means they are bricks,compared to the av8S they only carry 60 countermeasures which for a harrier at that br is not enough

1 Like

No lineup would be worthless as far as changes go.

Might as well add the thermal sight as a mod that remove the zoom option

1 Like

I honestly don’t oppose giving ATGM carriers their historical thermal sights, they are usually completely ass

Harrier GR.7
air RB

12.3->12.0

subsonic airframe with 4 9Ms, compared to other aircraft of the br is slower and overall less effective, 12.0 would be a more balanced br for its capabilities

2 Likes