Mig-15 bis ish - 8.0 - 8.0, no change. Instead remove the balistic computer which it doesnt have irl. From OP aircraft which can do everything in ground RB to good fighter with slightly better ground attack capabilities over the standart one.
1 Like
You might mix this up - Bearcats just saw no combat service, they were operational long before V-J day. Same as P-51 D-30s or P-51 H-5s - operational but no combat records.
Famous example for a post-war aircraft is the F4U-4b…or the Spits F 22 & F 24 (just the F 21 saw combat) - and ofc the Yak-3U…
Confidence should be based on facts, not believes…
4 Likes
Where’s the T58?
1 Like
Also fixed the Strv m/41 3.7 typo back down to 2.7 thanks for making me notice that lol
Please lower the BR of the Type 4 Fighter “Hayate Hei”(Ki-84 Hei) in AB…
1 Like
11.7 for bmpt is not enough, it deserve 12.3 or 12.7 due to his armement that pen anything from the front and survability with all his armor that eat any apfds round like nothing happen plus a crewless turret. It is better than most of top br vehicule, it deserve to be classify as it and have the good br (12.x)
5 Likes
Not if stuff like FW-190 is moved to 5.3.
Turm III
BR: 8.3 → 8.7/9.0 (all gamemodes)
There’s no reason for it to be 8.3 anymore. Out of everything, an autoloaded 105 with 30mm SAPHEFI should be moved up AT LEAST.
the very obvious ammo and crew placement should not decide the battle rating, so in turn it should be moved up to at least 8.7 or 9.0. End of discussion.
13 Likes
Wonder why Alpha Jet is going to be placed at 9.0 in air matches.
Vehicles: Chieftain Mk10, Chieftain 900
Gamemode: GRB
BR change: 9.3 > 9.0
Two reasons:
- The nerf was a mistake to begin with - there’s no reason Chieftains can’t share BR with XM803, ZTZ88A, M60 TTS or T-62M-1.
- In absence of a 9.0 lineup, increasing Scimitar Mk1’s BR effectively puts at 9.3, which it does not deserve.
7 Likes
9.7 is a very punishing environment
we have one strv 103 c
Aircraft:
J-15T
Mode:
Air RB
Proposed change:
14.7 > 14.3
Reasoning:
its worse in everyway if you compared to the other 14.7 flanker (Su-30SM2). Worse radar, worse flight model, less fox 3, worse fox 3 and half the countermeasures. Even if you compare it to the 14.3 SU-30 the only thing is gets is better engines at the cost of less fox 3, worse fox 3, no R-27ER and less countermeasures.
6 Likes
Vehicle: Re.2005 serie 0
Gamemode: Air Realistic
BR Change: 6.0 —> 6.0 (or 5.7)
Reason: This plane is not only slow as hell, but also has unreliable firepower as its MG-151 guns are very incompetent at 6.0. IT SHOULD NOT HAVE ITS BR UP AT ALL.
5 Likes
why are asago and alano still 3.7 ??? cant fight destroyers and can be killed by everything that have a 1x 40mm or a few 20mm and it has no speed to dodge destroyers shooting it from spawn its ha brutal experience…
Gamemode: GRB
Vehicle: BM OPLOT T/M
BR: 12.3 > 12.0
reasoning: this vehicle has just about 0 reason to be a higher br than the T80U-E1 considering it has basically the same capabilitys except worse gun handling and better reverse speed this BR change would give japan access to a better 12.0 lineup instead of having 1 over br,d 12.3 tank
4 Likes
I would vote if you mentioned lack of engine power, but I can’t vote for a weapons’ complaint cause its sheer volume of fire is one of the things I do enjoy about it.
the squadron Oplot is the Oplot M and not the Oplot P
1 Like
F4S - Give it aim 9L missiles. At that br even irccm missiles are common and not even having all aspect missiles is wild
My bad ill change it i forgot