Shells of Italian design and construction, without the Italian PzH2000, would be a contradiction.
STOP ALREADY! Calling this thing a tank destroyer is incorrect, and you devs know it. Any self-propelled howitzer that finds itself having to use direct fire has found itself in the wrong place. Seen any 2S1s or 2S3s intentionally used as “tank destroyers” in Ukraine by either side? No. нет. Nein.
Can SP and towed artillery pieces use direct fire? Yes, of course they can. They use that mode to defend an artillery position when the battlefield situation has fallen apart. Are they used that way intentionally? Absolutely not. I might even see their use if we were using infantry in an urban environment–to blow holes in the sides of buildings for the infantry to enter, or to clear enemy infantry positions from buildings, but that’s not what Warthunder is (note, the U.S. didn’t do this in Iraq, effectively using Bradley and M-1 main gun rounds).
You guys at Gaijin have coded the PzH 2000, so you’re gonna post it up, but this makes Warthunder more like World of Tanks than a serious armored combat game.
Gaijin must hate Italy. There is no other answer, really.
Why are we only getting romanian and hungarian vehicles lately? Why can’t we have an implemented one in the tech tree, our nation has been the second one to make the most us of it, all throughout the world!
Stona_WT
Actually the 155mm vulcano is co devolped by Leonardo and Rheinmetall
Fix the Sholef before you add more SPHs.
Oof my Bad.
why isn’t France getting the Dutch version?
Why isn’t Italy getting the ITALIAN version lmao
Exactly, I really think Gaijin just hates Italy for some reason, I wish it would just stop though and we could just get the vehicles that we used because it’s the ITALIAN TT, not the Hungarian one or the Romanian one.
minor nation treatment, it’s not fair but we can’t do much about it
Would be nive if the PzH2000 had an accurate reload rate and armor…
somehow a vehicle that is known to shoot 67km has the same velocity of the newly added m44 at 563m/s and even less velocity than the short barreled m109 and type 75 with 684 m/s and . somehow a vehicle that has spal liners dosnt have any. it still dosnt have any of its ammo like saphei and l15a1. if they want to go for only loading 4 powder why does it then have a 10s reload if for the full charges its known to fire 10 rounds in 60s.
Would be nive if the PzH2000 had an accurate reload rate and armor…
dude. they just copied the vidar thats why in dev server it had the thermals and the same ammo
also when did the pzh ever use 155mm oef 3? when irl it used l15a2
yeah have people even asked themselves if the french even want Leopards in their TT?