So… Since you finally made the mechanic to add different amount of ammo based on its “volume”, so, you can add either 1 big missile or 4 small ones in the same slot…
Can you now submit my bug report that Object 775 has 2x less HE ammo than it had in real life, since IRL 2 HE shells were fitted in 1 Missile slot? So it should have either 48 HE shells or 24 missiles. Or different combinations of them. I made the report like 2 years ago and I got the answer that there is no possibility to add it cuz coders don’t know how.
I love the fact that now you know how, pls fix Object 775 ammo, I beg you.
Better idea:
Have C-Ram and equivalent systems protect spawn regions on maps big enough to support it like large fulda (my beloved)
Realistically these systems would only be able to intercept munitions aimed at the spawn, and any daring heli pilots, which in term not only gives cas players a viable, important target to hit, but also spaa players a safer zone to operate in.
Which was a significant upgrade over the L2A5 that was already the best MBT in the game before it got DM-53 and the L2A6 added with the L/55 gun.
M-10 Booker 2024, Type 16 2016, Challenger 3 TD and black night 2018/19, VT-4 2020, VIDAR is a K9A1 2018, and the Boxer Germany is getting this next patch still hasn’t finished building the 1st order of them.
Look at one of the first posts in this thread where I posted a video. From my testing the 95Ya6M does not fuze unless you reset the fuze setting with the keybind. It doesn’t fuze on the target by default right now.
I don’t know what else to tell you aside from you just hopping on the dev yourself and testing it yourself.
I had a post about an addition of anti-munitions spaas for every nation as a a multi-vehicle spaa.
Like, you have a main “vehicle” that can drive and that can build stationary anti-munitions units that can’t drive but can be controlled either remotely via radar screen or manually.
Like turrets. But a player must assign a target for every turret he has.
IIRC it was accepted on russian forum and was sent to devs.
It even had a stationary pantsir turret with these small tkb missiles back then. Who knew that they will add it in a non-stationary variant.
Well, US had a Centurion C-RAM, Germany - Oerlikon Skynex and China - LD-3000
Well, it doesnt work like that on Russian forum, I’m afraid. There was a suggestion of mine, with 400 votes in favor, to add a single keybind (battle/transport mode toggle, long to describe) to vehicles, and 3 years later I’m still waiting for it…
Imagine like, you can go to a caputed point and put a turret there to be able to switch to it and defend the point against light tanks or assign an aerial target to it to defend a point and your teammates against bombs and other munitions.
Maybe with “automatic” mode that shoots only munitions that have a trajectory that will fall near the turret itself like, in 10 meters circle around it, idk. May be too op.
Why is Russia getting another SPAA? They’ve almost got one for every 0.3 BR step at this point. Lol.
What about all the nations with massive gaps? Huh? Weren’t we promised more indigenous US SPAA designs to fill those gaps? The Skink was just a bonus because the British got the Ram II, but the Skink is supposed to do all the heavy lifting for both the US tree from 5.3 - 7.3, and 5.3 to 8.3 in the British tree.
Surprise, surprise, it sucks at its job. It was good at 4.7, okay at 5.0, and worthless at 5.3 unless you’re in a down tier.
Holy made up nonsense. That is a very baseless claim, but if you want to go there, Kontact-5 and Relict ERA actually underperform against KE penetrators.
Ah yes the old “everything in Russia is op” argument. So you admit irl they have good vehicles then? Or is there something I’m missing?
Also, why do tournament players prefer the abrams over the t90 if Russia is so op?
Best top tier for ground is a hilarious joke. Sure the Su-30sm2 is good, but it’s not the best thing in the whole game, neither in the mi-28nm.
the T90M doesnt have great mobility unlike the abrams where its mobility is very good like decent reverse gear great turret armor and a good reload that about the only thing thats better than the T90M in game until the T90M2 which only gets the reverse gear of the T14 but the armor on the T90M is phenomenal cant even pen the upper front plate lower plate is volumetric hell and if you really want bias BMPT’s that this RUNS the BR that its been put at on release and still at 11.3 its bull there is so much bias in that the armor is wild and i never said everything in russia is OP im talking about their toptier like the KH38 no need for those missiles until they want to give NATO a KH38 equivalent the shouldnt be ingame the MI28NM is wild along with the Z10ME those both need a nerf and soon in SQB your forced to have either one since the LMUR and the BA11 its a loosing battle if you dont have either because of course once again they get the best AGM and before you say JAGM they cannot compare to these AGMS they are wildly better and if anything they tournament players will choose the BVM as said in your words its just a side copy but better mobility.
M10 booker is under preforming atleast for the beginning with heat and when i said nothing newer than 2010 i ment MBT not light tank im sorry that was my fault but you did make a point about the Chally and black night and i thought i put NATO vehicles my fault for not specifying again sorry
